In the 1880s, the study of natural sciences faced significant developments and changes. In 1882, the first Arbor Day was celebrated in Nebraska, symbolizing the growing awareness of environmental protection. This decade saw the founding of the National Geographic Society in 1888, which sought to promote exploration and understanding of the natural world. In 1887, the American Museum of Natural History opened its doors in New York City, becoming a center for scientific research and education. Additionally, the identification of the bacterium responsible for tuberculosis by Robert Koch in 1882 and the publication of Charles Darwin’s “The Formation of Vegetable Mold through the Action of Worms” in 1881 were important discoveries that advanced our understanding of ecology and biodiversity. Hui. Thus, the 1880s were a period of increased scientific exploration, conservation efforts, and dissemination of information about the complex workings of the natural world.
This means that in the 1880s, there was a noticeable shift in Nature’s editorials toward negatively political topics, building on the ground laid in the 1870s. These editorials adopted a more adventurous tone, which was in keeping with the growing morale towards the politicians of the time. An important legislative development during this time included the passage of the Elementary Education Act in England and Wales in 1880, which made compulsory school attendance for all children up to the age of ten. Before it was passed, Nature appealed to individuals such as William Harcourt, soon to hold the post of British Home Secretary, to give priority to science in political education, calling on him to consider it essential to the future of the country. Is. Integrating lived learning into the curriculum, it is essential that both politicians and citizens are guided by the principles of scientific politics.
Amidst the biases of scientific education, an important contribution to the field of forensic science appeared in a short paper published by Henry Faulds on 28 October 1880. In his paper titled ‘Skin-lines of the hand’ Faulds presented a unique idea: the use of skin lines for identification purposes, especially in criminal investigations. He proposed that bloodstained fingerprints or impressions on isolated surfaces could serve as scientific evidence to identify criminals. This notion laid the fundamental basis for the resulting results in forensic science today, with applications ranging from the identification of criminals to anthropology, genealogical studies, and medico-legal investigations. Faulds’s work showed the potential to revolutionally influence justice systems and the justice system.
Shortly after Faulds’s publication, another important figure, William Herschel, grandson of the discoverer of Urnus, was using finger formatting techniques for his son’s letter in northeast India. Herschel claimed that he had already used finger drafting techniques more than two decades before Faulds’s letter. This sparked a controversial debate in the scientific community, in which prominent statistician Francis Galton also expressed his views. Despite the controversy over precedence, Faulds’s paper provides clear documentation of the scientific benefits to using finger profiling in criminal identification. His idea led to the creation of “natural copies” of individuals’ unique finger pits, thereby potentially leading to scientific advancements in a unique way.
The 1880s marked the beginning of a period of politicization and promotion of scientific education in England and Wales, as reflected in Nature’s editorials. This era also saw pioneering contributions to forensic science, with Henry Faulds’s paper encouraging recognition of finger patterning as a valuable tool in natural identification. Faulds’s work establishes the fundamental basis for further developments in forensic science, highlighting the transformative possibilities of scientific inquiry in shaping justice and justice systems.
For Joseph Norman Lockyer the 1880s were a period of significant work in progress, marked by fame and recognition in the scientific community. First, he held the prestigious post of head of the Center for the Study of Solar Physics in South Kensington, London in the late 1870s. This appointment not only reflected his expertise in solar physics, but also provided him with a research expense of £500, which gave him the possibility of pursuing studies in this area even further. Subsequently, in 1881, Lockyer’s career path moved even higher when he was appointed lecturer at the nearby Normal School of Science, later known as the Royal College of Science. With this appointment he received a stipend of £750 per annum, in recognition of his educational contributions. Over time, Lockyer’s dedication and expertise earned him an appointment as Professor of Astronomical Physics in 1887, making him a major figure in astronomy.
Lockyer’s professional endeavors were not limited to the realms of science; He also built important relationships with prominent figures outside the scientific community. One such prominent relationship was with the great poet Alfred Lord Tennyson. Tennyson, who shared Lockyer’s passion for astronomy, developed a close friendship with the scientist. This bond was ensured by Tennyson’s recognition of Lockyer’s contributions, as expressed in his appreciation: “In my anthropological alphabet, you are as colorful as the first-rate strings of science.” Lockyer’s ability to make connections across any number of subjects also reflects his developing intelligence and his respected status in Victorian society.
In the late 19th century, the leading scientific journal, Nature, played an important role in disseminating scientific knowledge globally. The eruption of the Krakatau volcano in 1883, a catastrophic event that reverberated throughout the world, prompted Nature to mobilize its wide readership for scientific observation. The journal’s call to action, calling on its international readership to make observations to the Royal Society Krakatau Committee, reflects its commitment to supporting scientific research. This collaborative effort reflects the growing interconnectedness of the global scientific community and highlights the important role that publications like Nature play in fostering scientific exchange and collaboration.
The late 1880s witnessed a transitional period in the landscape of British science, marked by the emergence of a structured professional practice for engineering. Historically, the absence of a formal professional structure and limited opportunities in science academia hindered the professional forward movement of UK scientists. However, in the late 1880s, significant changes occurred, laying the foundation for a blossoming scientific movement. In particular, the contributions of influential academics such as John Tyndall fueled this change. Tyndall’s tireless campaign for science education and his efforts to demonstrate its progress, relating it to the public and its relationship to industrial progress, signaled the beginning of a new era. In support of Tyndall’s achievements, a Nature editorial praised his achievements, viewing science as a fundamental basis of social progress, noting the importance of nurturing a decorated scientific corps to maintain Britain’s industrial primacy. . This acceptance marked a paradigm shift, reaffirming the importance of science in shaping Britain’s future path and heralding a golden age of scientific exploration.