Skype, a communication platform that was once one of the most innovative tools for online voice and video calling, has unfortunately become a fertile ground for cheaters and scammers around the world. Although the company behind Skype originally created it with the aim of bridging distances and connecting families, businesses, and professionals, it has over time been appropriated by malicious elements. Often these people working in organized networks found that the same features that had made Skype attractive to real users also provided a convenient platform for fraudulent activities. Skype’s global reach, ease of creating accounts, and its cross-border communication system have all made it a preferred platform for fraudulent actions.
Cheaters don’t randomly choose a platform. They look for systems where anonymity prevails, where verification is weak, where communication is fast and difficult to detect, and where the user base is broad enough to provide a large pool of potential victims. Skype meets these requirements almost completely. To understand why Skype is so heavily exploited by scammers, we need to examine the structure of this platform, the psychological tricks it employs, and the flaws in the rules that allow fraud to flourish.
The Historical Evolution Of Skype And Its Charm
The introduction of Skype brought about a radical change in the way people communicate in the digital age. Founded in 2003 by Niklas Zenstrom and Janus Fris, Skype was based on the revolutionary concept of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Before Skype, international calling was extremely expensive. Traditional phone calls relied on physical telecommunications infrastructure, and long-distance and international calls were often overcharged. For both ordinary people and small businesses, it hindered the maintenance of personal and professional relationships across borders. Skype removed this barrier by taking advantage of the Internet, which was becoming increasingly widespread, and provided a platform where sound and later video communications could be done at minimal or no cost.
Skype’s early fascination lay in its intelligibility and simplicity. Unlike the complex software or corporate-focused communication tools available at the time, Skype was designed for general users. Anyone with an email address could register an account, download the software, and initiate communications within minutes. No technical expertise or specialized hardware was required other than basic computers and Internet connections. This ease democratized global communication, giving ordinary people an unprecedented ability to interact across continents as easily as they would with anyone in their city.
The design philosophy of this platform contributed significantly to its rapid adoption. Skype included a user-friendly interface, intuitive controls for calling, messaging, and later video conferencing. Unlike other early VoIP solutions, which often required complex configurations, Skype’s plug-and-play functionality allowed anyone to start using the service immediately. The simplicity and reliability of the service contributed to explosive growth: in its first few years, Skype had hundreds of millions of registered users, and this number only grew as broadband Internet became more common around the world.
However, this immense popularity also created an unintended vulnerability. Millions of people were attracted to Skype for legitimate purposes— staying in touch with family, coordinating business meetings, or connecting with new acquaintances—, but the platform inadvertently became a fertile ground for malicious people. Cheaters quickly recognized that the ease of communication and lack of strict identity verification made Skype an attractive place for fraud. Unlike face-to-face conversations, where visual cues and physical presence could prevent deception, Skype’s digital environment allowed criminals to operate invisibly behind the screen. This dual nature— built a huge, mostly monitoring-less user base providing unprecedented connectivity— made Skype a powerful tool for both general communication and illegal activity.
Additionally, Skype’s low-cost model made it particularly attractive to users who needed to maintain long-distance connections. People from developing countries could connect with their family members working abroad, while businesses could coordinate internationally without incurring huge telecommunications expenses. This wide appeal in various demographics—, from students and migrant workers to multinational corporations, meant that almost anyone could become a potential target of fraudsters. The success of this platform in reducing the difficulty and cost of international communication paradoxically led to the creation of a system where convenience also became a risk, allowing fraudsters to seamlessly blend in with legitimate users.
Ultimately, Skype’s historical evolution reflects the tension between access and security. While the platform democratized communication globally and changed the way people interact with people from the far-right, it also created a digital environment where anonymity, lack of monitoring, and ease of use could be leveraged. Was. Features that revolutionized Skype—its simplicity, affordability and global reach— made it attractive even to people with malicious intentions, ushering in a new era of online fraud and deception.
Anonymity As The Main Attraction
Missingness is the root cause that has made platforms like Skype such a fertile ground for scammers. In traditional scams, physical presence is necessary, and perpetrators face risks of identification, legal consequences, or physical confrontation. Online, the rules of engagement change significantly. Platforms that allow individuals to hide their real-world identities when interacting with others create a unique environment where criminal activities can flourish with minimal risk.
Skype is an example of this principle of anonymity. Creating a Skype account is very easy. Unlike many contemporary online services, which require detailed identity verification or a government identity card, Skype allows users to register from almost any email address. There is no rigorous mechanism to confirm the authenticity of the name, age or place. One can create multiple accounts in minutes using fake information, pseudonyms and forged email addresses. This simplicity attracts not only ordinary users seeking convenience, but also fraudsters who want to work without any traceability. A fraudster from one country can reliably portray himself as a person living thousands of miles away, in another city or even in another country, and that too without leaving any digital trace that could identify him immediately.
Being anonymous can create completely imaginary personalities that seem believable. They can use stolen photos, borrow someone else’s social media profile, or create background stories that appeal to their intended target. In the context of Skype, it has been exploited in a variety of fraudulent schemes. Romance scams, for example, exploit human connection and a desire for trust. Scammers build relationships over time, and often emotionally influence victims before asking for money. Because Skype supports both messaging and video calling, criminals can control the visual information they give to victims, creating an illusion of authenticity. Even in business fraud, scammers can mislead victims into withdrawing money or sharing sensitive information by becoming investors, consultants or recruiters.
Furthermore, the digital environment allows fraudsters to maintain a network of fake identities. They can create multiple accounts to further the same scam story, giving the impression of social proof or legitimacy. Victims, unaware that they are falling victim to well-planned deception, are often easily misled. Thus, anonymity is not just a feature, but a strategic tool for criminals. This allows them to avoid personal accountability, evade law enforcement, and exploit trust-based relationships, which would be very hard to manipulate in the physical world.
The impact of anonymity goes far beyond personal scams. It also promotes a culture of risk and vigilance among users. People interacting on Skype cannot rely solely on intuition to detect deception because visual cues can be fabricated and personal information can be falsified. This uncertainty increases the effectiveness of scams, as potential victims often assume that anyone they encounter on such platforms is acting in good faith. Thus, the basic element of Skype’s design— ease of access, minimal verification and global connectivity— becomes an advantage for the malicious.
Anonymity is a double-edged sword. While it protects the privacy of common users and provides freedom of expression online, it also provides a means for criminals to work without being caught. Platforms like Skype demonstrate how the lack of rigorous verification, combined with global access and multimedia communications, can be systematically exploited, leading to fraud flourishing.
Skype’s Global Reach
One of the most important features that makes Skype attractive to fraudsters is its global reach. From its inception, Skype was designed as a borderless communication platform. Unlike traditional telecommunications networks, which are bound by infrastructure and regulatory boundaries, Skype operates on the Internet, allowing users to communicate across continents as if geography did not matter. This global access is a powerful tool for legitimate communication—business interactions, family relationships and educational cooperation—, but it is equally beneficial for scammers looking for insecure goals around the world.
The removal of geographical barriers means that criminals will no longer be confined to the victims around them. Any scammer operating in a country with a weak regulatory framework or weak enforcement standards can target people in wealthier and more regulated countries, with minimal risk. Skype lets them adopt personalities that are culturally and socially believable to their target audience. For example, a fraudster from South-East Asia may target people from North America or Europe by impersonating an investor or corporate recruiter. Victims away from the physical surroundings of the scammer have limited options to verify authenticity.
Video calls add an additional layer of manipulation. Although videos are generally seen as a defense against deception, crafty scammers can control what they show the victim. They can use pre-recorded video, select photos carefully, or even use shallow angles and low-light environments to hide inconsistencies. The psychological effect of “seeing” the person on the other side promotes trust, increasing the likelihood of victims sharing sensitive information or transferring money. In this sense, Skype’s multimedia capabilities enhance a scammer’s ability to fabricate believable stories.
The global reach of this platform also promotes highly organized fraud schemes. Scammers can collaborate across borders, coordinating multiple accounts and roles in a single scam. One person may pose as a financial advisor, another as a verification officer, and a third as a sympathetic intermediary, and all of whom appear to the victim to be legitimate partners. This internationalization of fraudulent activities enhances their effectiveness.
Furthermore, Skype’s global network allows continuous operation. Because time zones vary, scammers can carry out their activities around the clock, targeting victims at the time when they are most likely to respond. After a successful scam, they can instantly disappear, avoiding detection, by taking advantage of the vast digital space. For law enforcement agencies, the cross-border nature of these activities complicates investigations, which often require international cooperation that may be slow or incomplete.
The global character of Skype is an important factor in its attractiveness to fraudsters. This allows them to operate across continents, maintaining anonymity and exploiting trust through controlled interaction. While this platform offers incredible opportunities for connectivity, this same global reach creates an environment where criminal activities can escalate without any major risks. The combination of borderless communication, video capabilities and easy access creates a powerful toolkit for online scammers, demonstrating how the merits of digital platforms can be turned into weaknesses.
Weak Account Verification And Fake Identification
A fundamental structural weakness of Skype lies in its account creation and verification system. Unlike financial institutions, government communications platforms, or some modern social media networks, Skype does not require rigorous identity authentication for users. This design choice, originally intended to prioritize access and convenience, inadvertently opens the door to exploitation. Anyone with an email address can create an account, meaning there are almost no barriers to entry. Furthermore, there is no mechanism to verify the authenticity of a person’s name, place, age or any other identifying details. Users are free to adopt pseudonyms, fictitious personalities, and even stolen identities without any immediate identification. While it promotes user growth and encourages informal communication, it also creates a favorable environment for malicious elements.
Cheaters exploit this structural weakness remarkably efficiently. They often operate dozens or hundreds of fake accounts simultaneously, each of which performs a specific function in their extensive fraud scheme. For example, one account may present as a friendly confidant, another as a professional intermediary, and a third as a support contact or ‘proof’ of validity. This multi-layered strategy creates an illusion of authenticity, making it extremely difficult for victims to distinguish fact and fabrication. If one account is reported, flagged, or blocked by Skype or authorities, the scammer can immediately switch to another account, and continue their work almost seamlessly. This revolving door of fake identities complicates enforcement efforts and allows malicious users to operate with minimal risk.
Lack of identity verification also affects the effectiveness of law enforcement. Cross-border checking of online scams often relies on digital traces linked to real identities. In the absence of verified accounts, detection of fraudulent activities becomes a complex process. Scammers can use VPNs, proxy servers, and other anonymity tools to hide their real whereabouts, making checking even more complicated. In many cases, victims do not even know where the perpetrator is located, making it extremely difficult to take legal measures or recover lost property. Thus, the structural weakness of Skype’s verification system increases the reach and flexibility of cybercriminal networks.
This vulnerability is not limited to individual fraud; it also extends to organized crime. Sophisticated scam networks use Skype’s allowed account system to run large-scale campaigns targeting thousands of users around the world. These campaigns can include identity theft, financial fraud, phishing campaigns, and even psychological manipulation, and are all facilitated by the ability to create many reliable-looking accounts. Furthermore, the absence of stringent checks reduces the likelihood of users facing the consequences of their actions, reinforcing the culture of impunity.
The design philosophy behind Skype—preferring ease of use and quick adoption over strict security measures— essentially gave fraudsters a huge advantage. Although the platform was revolutionary for democratizing global communications, the structural flaw in account verification remains an ongoing challenge, allowing malicious elements to exploit the system relatively free of penalty. This illustrates a broad lesson in digital platform design: prioritizing access without adequate safeguards can lead to systemic weaknesses that can be easily leveraged by criminals.
Benefits Of Video And Voice Features
One of the biggest reasons scammers are attracted to Skype is that the platform is able to simulate authentic, real-time communication through voice and video. Unlike text-only systems or emails that rely solely on written communication, Skype offers interactive multimedia communication that can create the illusion of a real human connection. This is especially important for cheaters because humans are naturally prone to trust what they can see and hear. Voice fluctuations, facial expressions, and visual cues usually strengthen credibility, increasing victims’ chances of accepting information without a doubt.
Scammers take advantage of these features strategically. For example, in romance scams, criminals may pretend to be attractive, trustworthy individuals who actually seem to care about the victim’s well-being. Video calls create a sense of personal connection that is extremely difficult to replicate via text. Even poor quality videos can be used to benefit scammers. Cheaters often use low-resolution cameras, poor lighting or unstable video to hide anomalies and avoid detailed checks. Some people may also use pre-recorded video clips, which are carefully crafted to be shown live, or manipulate their surroundings to hide signs of deception. Thus, the visual and auditory elements of Skype communication serve as a powerful tool to strengthen trust and credibility, as well as hide fraudulent intentions.
Voice communication also plays an important role in manipulating perception. Tone, movement, and emotional expression, all can be carefully controlled to elicit specific responses from victims. For example, a scammer may adopt a calm and sympathetic tone to gain empathy or readiness depending on the circumstance. This is especially effective in financial scams, where rights, trust or readiness need to be established to persuade victims to give money. Voice communication gives subtle signals that text alone cannot give, making it a powerful tool in the scammer’s toolkit.
The ability to mix sound and video also allows scammers to fabricate detailed narratives. For example, someone posing as a military officer stationed abroad may excuse poor video quality due to an unstable Internet connection, or present a theatrical room as proof of authenticity. These details, while superficial, create an illusion of truth. The victim, by perceiving the conversation as genuine, is less likely to question inconsistencies.
In addition, Skype’s multimedia features enable scammers to react dynamically to the victim’s reactions. Unlike static communications like email, where the recipient has time to think or check, real-time video calls allow fraudsters to adjust their approach quickly, increasing the psychological impact. This adaptability makes it quite easy to emotionally manipulate victims, whether by creating a sense of empathy, urgency, or obligation.
Skype’s video and voice features aren’t just features—they are strategic tools that fraudsters use to pretend authenticity, control perception, and manipulate victims. The multimedia nature of the platform transforms online communication into a rich, interactive experience that can be used for both legitimate purposes and detailed scams. Thus, technologies designed to foster human relationships become a means of deception when they fall into the wrong hands.
Psychological Manipulation Through Personal Contact
One of the most insidious aspects of Skype-based scams is the ability to psychologically manipulate victims through personal contact. Unlike email or text messaging, which are inherently impersonal, Skype allows for sound and video communication, creating a sense of intimacy that is difficult to replicate through other online mediums. Cheaters use this psychological aspect to build trust, manipulate emotions, and ultimately extract money or sensitive information from unsuspecting victims.
The human brain is made to respond to social signals and interpersonal interactions. When victims hear a person’s voice or see their face, they unconsciously attach credibility and emotional importance to that conversation. Cheaters exploit this trend by promoting a sense of closeness and personal connection. For example, in romance scams, criminals may make daily or weekly video calls for weeks or months, gradually developing emotional bonds. This lengthy interaction reduces suspicion, making the victim more vulnerable to manipulation. The illusion of friendship, lovemaking or professional guidance creates a powerful psychological attraction that can be used repeatedly.
Personal contact also promotes a variety of manipulative strategies. Scammers may use flattery, sympathy, or shared interests to build relationships. They may also take advantage of the victim’s desire for responsibility, mercy, or companionship. By describing themselves as observant, caring, or knowledgeable, scammers take advantage of natural social and emotional vulnerabilities. Personal touch transforms the conversation from a transactional relationship to an emotionally significant one, increasing the likelihood that the victim will follow requests without question, such as transferring money, sharing passwords, or following instructions.
Skype’s ability to convey subtle social cues further strengthens this psychological manipulation. Voice pronunciation, pauses, eye contact and facial expressions, all available via video call, can be used to elicit specific emotional responses. A scammer can sense hesitation or doubt in the victim’s voice and adjust their approach, providing reassurance or promptness when needed. This real-time feedback loop helps scammers improve their strategy, making cheating more effective than static, text-based communication.
Additionally, the sense of intimacy developed through Skype interactions can lead to cognitive biases that leave victims unaware of danger signs. Victims often assume that someone who has taken time to communicate, shared personal stories, or shown to be emotionally vulnerable will be trustworthy. This illusion of proximity can negate logical caution, allowing victims to ignore anomalies or warning signs that would have been apparent in other contexts. The psychological impact increases when scammers use strategies such as artificial video backgrounds, carefully selected props, or pre-recorded messages to reinforce the illusion of authenticity.
Skype’s environment gives fraudsters the chance to exploit the human tendency to rely on personal contact. By feigning intimacy, controlling visual and auditory cues, and emotionally connecting victims, scammers turn a simple online conversation into a psychologically manipulative encounter. Therefore, the personal nature of Skype communication is both its strength and weakness: it enables meaningful contacts, but also provides a powerful mechanism for deception when misused.
Role Of Business Communication On Skype
Skype is widely recognized as a means of personal communication, but its importance in professional and business contexts has increased significantly over the years. Its cost-free nature, cross-platform access and multimedia capabilities make it an attractive option for businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), startups and freelancers, which often operate with limited budgets. The platform facilitates instant messaging, voice calls, video conferencing and screen sharing, which are important tools for collaboration in today’s globalized economy. Its attraction lies in its convenience and professional presentation: Skype calls or video conferences are usually considered official and legitimate, even if the participants have never met face-to-face. Unfortunately, scammers exploit this notion to commit business fraud, and exploit users’ trust in the platform as a professional medium.
One of the most common schemes involves impersonating companies, suppliers or customers. Scammers often create fake accounts using email addresses such as corporate logos, professional-sounding names, and legitimate businesses. They then reach unsuspecting victims and offer them “profitable” business deals, investment opportunities or authentic-looking contracts. Because Skype is widely used in business circles, victims cannot question the validity of the conversation. The platform’s interface—, including video, audio and chat logs, creates a wrapper of reliability that scammers exploit to quickly gain trust.
Job scams are another area where Skype’s business functionality is abused. Cheaters pose as recruitment agencies or recruitment managers, and often target job seekers desperate to find a job or willing to relocate internationally. The scam process usually starts with an attractive job advertisement or unwanted contact with a trusted account. They can conduct interviews on Skype, which include professional sounding scripts and gimmicky video presentations. Once trust is established, victims are asked to pay a fee for a “visa procedure”, a “training programme” or a “background check”. Once paid by the victim, the scammer disappears without a trace. Skype is central to this fraud, as it allows real-time interaction, making the scam appear highly legitimate, while hiding the scammer’s true intentions.
Small firms are particularly vulnerable because they often lack sophisticated verification procedures or awareness of cyber threats. Unlike large companies, which may have established protocols for checking customers or partners, SMEs often rely on the obvious professionalism of Skype calls or video meetings as proof of validity. Scammers exploit this notion, taking advantage of the platform’s capabilities to mimic real business interactions, sometimes scheduling multiple calls, submitting digital contracts, or sending forged invoices. By simulating the normal operation of a legitimate business, they create a sense of trust and urgency, prompting victims to take action without having to carry out independent verification.
Skype’s business communications features, including screen sharing and file transfer, add another layer to the scammer’s toolkit. Scammers may request victims to share sensitive documents, banking information or proprietary content under the guise of conducting legitimate business transactions. These actions often lead to intellectual property theft, financial loss or identity fraud. In short, Skype’s professional tools, designed to increase collaboration and productivity, become instruments of deception when abused by malicious actors.
The professional image of this platform, and the trust that is generally found in business transactions, lead to scams that can cause huge financial and reputation damage. Victims often assume that they are negotiating with real companies, which increases their chances of ignoring warning signs that might otherwise raise suspicion. The combination of accessibility, professional reliability and multimedia communication ensures that Skype remains a major target of business scams.
Difficulty Detecting Skype Communications
A major challenge in dealing with Skype-based scams is the inherent difficulty of detecting communications. Fraudsters abuse not only the platform, but also the broader digital environment to hide their identity and location, making law enforcement intervention extremely complex. Unlike physical crimes, which are often limited by geographic boundaries, Skype fraud occurs in a virtual space that transcends boundaries. A scammer from one country can target a victim thousands of miles away, making it difficult for law enforcement agencies in many jurisdictions to coordinate. This geographical separation gives rise to legal and procedural challenges, as authorities have to deal with differing national laws, confidentiality rules and checking capacities.
Even when a victim reports a scam, finding the culprit often involves identifying the IP address, email source, and account activity. Scammers are aware of these investigative techniques and take deliberate measures to hide their digital footprints. Common devices include the use of public Internet access points such as virtual private networks (VPNs), proxy servers, and cyber cafes, which make it extremely difficult to track a person’s physical location. These gimmicks create concealment on multiple levels, giving the impression that the scammer is almost untouched. For law enforcement agencies, this means that despite adequate technical expertise, identification and arrest of the offender may take months or even years—, even if this is possible.
Skype’s account creation system adds to this problem. Since users can register and maintain multiple accounts at once without any rigorous identity verification, it is difficult to link a fraudulent account to a real person. If an account is blocked or reported, scammers can immediately create a new account and resume their work without any interruption. This “rotating door” effect renders standard enforcement measures ineffective and lets the scammer network operate continuously. Even well-documented evidence, such as call recordings, chat logs or transaction records, may be insufficient to fix responsibility without cooperation among many jurisdictions and institutions.
Bureaucratic obstacles to international cooperation slow down checks even further. Coordination between police forces, cybersecurity agencies and judicial authorities of different countries often requires formal requests, adherence to different legal frameworks and long response times. By the time a case reaches an actionable state, the scammer has moved on, erased the digital trace, or created new victims. These systemic challenges encourage fraudsters, who understand that the chances of being caught are relatively low compared to the potential financial gain.
Furthermore, the rapid development of technology works in favor of scammers. They can adopt new anonymity tools, encryption techniques and disposable digital identities faster than regulatory or enforcement systems. Skype, designed to facilitate free and accessible communication, inadvertently provides an ideal infrastructure for these activities. Real-time communication, multimedia support and global access naturally complicate tracing and action, creating a sense of impunity that promotes continued exploitation.
The difficulty of detecting Skype communications reflects the challenges inherent in tracking online fraud. Despite advanced cybersecurity measures and collaborative international frameworks, the combination of anonymity, border-less operations and technological sophistication ensures that criminals remain out of reach. This reality underscores why Skype remains a preferred tool for cross-border criminal activities.
Exploitation Of Developing Countries And Vulnerable Users
Skype’s global reach makes it a major platform to target vulnerable users, especially in areas where Internet use is growing rapidly but digital literacy is low. In developing countries, people may be relatively new to online communication, unaware of the risks associated with digital interactions, or unfamiliar with the strategies used by scammers. Scammers exploit these vulnerabilities by presenting themselves as trusted individuals, often targeting those who are willing to take advantage of opportunities abroad, find employment, or gain financial benefits. The lack of experience in recognizing warning signs makes these people particularly sensitive.
The ease of use and professionalism of this platform further strengthens trust. For example, a video call from someone claiming to be a recruiter or investor may seem quite reliable to a first-time Internet user. Victims often assume that this platform in itself provides a degree of credibility; if the conversation takes place on Skype, they may consider it “safe” by default. Scammers take advantage of this notion, and carefully craft messages, scripts, and video presentations to mislead their victim. In rural areas or areas with limited access to formal communication networks, Skype may seem particularly authoritative, helping criminals establish their legitimacy.
Socio-economic inequalities also fuel the exploitation of vulnerable populations. Scammers in low-income countries may consider targeting rich countries an attractive opportunity, as potential financial profits are many times higher than local income. For example, a fraudster from a developing country may impersonate a foreign employer or investor to extort huge sums of money from people in high-income countries. Skype’s borderless communication framework removes geographic barriers, allowing criminals to instantly connect different socio-economic worlds. This creates a serious imbalance: the fraudster’s operating costs are low, while the victim’s potential losses are significant.
Older and digitally inexperienced people are particularly at risk. People who grew up before the digital age may lack the deep awareness needed to detect online manipulation. Scammers take advantage of the trust inherent in these people, often to extort money or sensitive information by using emotional narratives, immediacy, or partner promises. Similarly, desperate job seekers looking for opportunities abroad fall victim to recruitment scandals, where scammers take advantage of a lack of ambition and experience to charge fees for the visa process, training or travel arrangements, which are never met.
Cultural and social factors play a role in exploitation. In communities with hierarchical social norms or deep respect for power, scammers can easily achieve compliance by becoming officials, business leaders, or foreign professionals. Skype’s ability to copy official communications— through logos, video calls and professional language enhances the perceived validity of conversations. The combination of digital gullibility, economic inequality, and cultural dynamics makes insecure users prime targets for fraudsters, who use Skype as a global medium of exploitation.
Skype’s accessibility and professional presence, combined with differences in digital literacy and socio-economic disparities, create ideal conditions for exploitation. Vulnerable populations in developing countries are particularly at risk, as scammers can connect with victims across borders while hiding their identities. This unequal exchange, enabled by techn
Read Also:
- Understanding Skype Accounts
- Auditor Should Develop New Ways Of Preventing Fraud In Government Departments, Improving Capacity: Modi
- Digital Fraud Doubled Home Ministry Told Parliament-UPI Also Included
- Attention Cyber Attackers Are Hidden In Your Phone, Government Warns, Told The Way To Rescue
- New Law To Surf Torrent Site In India
- What You Should Do If You Are Getting Cyber-Bullies
- What To Do When Online Shopping Fraud? Cyber Fraud Complaint, Return Money And Rescue
- Damage On Social Media Defamation Streams, Punishment And Complaint Process
- What Is Cyberstalking Punishment, Act And Complaint Process
- Lime In Online Fraud, Run A Lot Of Hands And Feet, These People Do Not Get Money Back, These Are RBI Guidelines
- Scope Of Scams: Social Media Platform And Online Fraud
- Whatsapp Phishing How To Make A New Trap? Government Has Tight Waist, 7.8 Lakh Sim, 83,000 Account Blocks
- Fraud And Scams Are Growing Rapidly In Kolkata: Kolkata Government, Police Department And Cyber Cell All Are Corrupt
-  Manoj Kumar Verma – A Black Mark On The Name Of Kolkata Police CommissionerLessons, Resolutions, These 10 Tips From Cyber Crime, Which Will Protect You From Cyber FraudAvoid Online Fraud? So Leave The Habit Of Clicking Without Thinking, Know 5 Easy Ways To Avoid Cyber Fraud
- Cyber Fraud: Why Is It Necessary To Avoid Fraud In The Digital Phase? Learn What To Keep From Expert
- People Years Of Hard Work And Earning Can Be Cleared In Few Minutes, These Methods Should Be Adopted To Avoid Cyber Fraud
- The Most Accurate Way To Avoid Cybercrime! Take These Precautions, Will Not Be Fraud Victims
- How Is Digital Arrest? Real-Looking Officer On Parcel, Gift And Whatsapp Call; What Is The Whole Game?
- Be Careful With These 14 Ways Of Cyber Fraud! Account Can Be Empty In The Blink Of An Eye; What Are The Measures To Avoid
- What Is Cybercrime? Complete Information
- What Is Cyber Security
