The term “major scams and controversies involving Mamata Banerjee and Trinamool Congress (TMC)” refers to a series of allegations, fraudulent activities, irregularities and political controversies involving her political leadership since West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her party TMC came to power, mainly since 2011 These scandals and disputes affect various sectors, including government schemes, public resources, infrastructure projects, education, health, financial management, law enforcement and political governance. These often include claims of misuse of public funds, corruption, favouritism, nepotism, irregular tendering procedures, mismanagement of State-run programmes and illegal or unethical political actions.
Scandals involving Mamata Banerjee and the Trinamool Congress are generally classified as financial corruption, administrative misconduct, political misconduct and law and order failures. Financial corruption typically involves the alleged misappropriation or embezzlement of public funds from welfare programmes, state-run development projects and central government allocations. Administrative misconduct includes allegations of irregularities in awarding contracts, mismanagement of infrastructure projects and ignorance of legal protocols in governance, often raising concerns over transparency and accountability. Political misconduct includes allegations of voter tampering, misuse of government machinery for electoral gains, suppression of dissent, and favoritism towards party loyalists in public positions. Law-and-order disputes often arise from allegations of political violence, police complicity, or selective enforcement of laws to benefit certain groups while harming opponents.
Many of these disputes are motivated by claims of systemic corruption, where involvement is not limited to individual leaders, but is alleged to extend to the bureaucratic, political and institutional levels, creating a complex web of irregularities. This has often sparked debate on standards of governance, ethical leadership and the effectiveness of institutional scrutiny. Furthermore, the controversies surrounding Mamata Banerjee and TMC sometimes reflect broader social and political tensions, including issues of caste, religion, regional politics and ideological divisions. Public perception of these scandals often varies, with political opponents highlighting allegations of corruption and misconduct, while supporters emphasize development achievements and welfare initiatives.
Major scams and controversies involving Mamata Banerjee and TMC are an important topic of discussion in the analysis of the political scenario of West Bengal, accountability in governance and moral responsibilities of elected officials. These issues affect not only public confidence and trust in democratic institutions, but also policy-making, electoral outcomes and the socio-economic development of the State. These issues remain the subject of legal, media and civil society scrutiny, reflecting the ongoing challenges in striking a balance between political power, governance and transparency in India.
1. After Nandigram Violence – TMC Accused Of Selective Justice
The Nandigram incident is one of the most controversial and violent incidents in the political history of West Bengal, which significantly influenced the rise of Mamata Banerjee and TMC. In 2007, the Left Front-led Government of West Bengal attempted to acquire land on a large scale in Nandigram in East Midnapore for a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to be developed by the Salim Group. Villagers protested violently, citing forced land acquisition and displacement. On March 14, 2007, police opened fire on protesters, killing at least 14 people, while unofficial estimates put the number of casualties at much higher.
After TMC came to power under Mamata Banerjee in 2011, allegations of partisan justice emerged. Critics and opposition parties alleged that the state machinery adopted a partisan attitude by not thoroughly investigating the crimes allegedly committed by TMC supporters during the post-poll violence and land disputes. Reports suggested that those opposing TMC’s political interests, including former Left Front supporters and activists, were harassed and in some cases, the arrests were politically motivated. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, raised concerns about the impunity enjoyed by political activists involved in violent acts. This led to the perception that justice in West Bengal is biased, depending on political allegiance, thereby undermining the rule of law.
2. Singur Land Acquisition Case Overturned – Industrial Investors Accused Of Mismanagement
The Singur dispute is another landmark case in West Bengal politics, focusing on land acquisition for industrial purposes. In 2006, the Left Front government had acquired about 997 acres of agricultural land at Singur in Hooghly district to facilitate the construction of Tata Motors’ factory for the Nano car project. The move was widely opposed by farmers, local residents and political opponents including Mamata Banerjee.
After the victory of Trinamool Congress in the 2011 state assembly elections, Mamata Banerjee’s first major action was to reverse land acquisition policies and cancel land transfers to industrial investors. Although hailed as a victory for the farmers, it created considerable differences with industrial stakeholders. Tata Motors eventually moved the Nano project to Gujarat, citing political uncertainty, policy uncertainty, and alleged harassment of the company and its employees. Critics argued that Trinamool’s sudden overturning of former land acquisition agreements reduced investor confidence in West Bengal. The dispute highlighted the tension between populist policies in favor of local farmers and the need for industrial investment, which adversely affected the state’s economic and prestige.
3. Initial Disclosure Of Saradha Chit Fund – Relations With TMC Leaders Started Coming To Light
Saradha Group’s financial scandal, which came to public notice in 2013, exposed one of India’s biggest Ponzi schemes. The company collected money by promising high returns from millions of small investors, especially in West Bengal, and then went bankrupt and defrauded investors of more than ₹2,500 crore. The investigation revealed that the scheme had been running for years under political patronage.
Soon allegations of several TMC leaders being associated with Saradha group came to light. The charges ranged from receiving funding for political campaigns to active participation in the management and promotion of the plan. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conducted several raids and filed charges against top officials and some political figures. Critics argue that the Mamata Banerjee-led state government either ignored or quietly promoted these financial irregularities, allowing the scheme to flourish unabated. The scandal caused a widespread social crisis, as many small investors, including daily wage laborers, lost their lifetime deposits. Despite this, political accountability remained limited, and many activists and victims accused the Trinamool Congress government of protecting the accused leaders. The case remains a symbol of alleged financial corruption involving political power.
4. Bias In Government Contracts – Allegations Of Giving Tenders To People Associated With The Party
Since Mamata Banerjee came to power in 2011, TMC has been repeatedly accused of giving preferential treatment to government contracts and tenders to companies linked to party leaders or supporters. Critics claim that this practice affects transparency, increases corruption and undermines fair competition.
For example, several reports emerged alleging that contracts for infrastructure projects, urban development schemes and welfare distribution were disproportionately awarded to companies linked to TMC. Media investigations and opposition claims revealed that these contracts were often not competitively bid, which increased the cost of public projects. In 2014, several whistleblower reports highlighted how small and medium-sized contractors, which had no political connections, were systematically excluded from tenders. These allegations fabricated a story that TMC leveraged political power to reward loyalists and strengthen financial influence, and that government funds were likely used for private or political gain. Although the government often denied such claims, opposition parties continued to use it as a major criticism of Mamata Banerjee’s rule.
5. Mismanagement Of Law And Order – Clashes Between TMC And Left Front Workers
After TMC came to power in 2011, West Bengal witnessed an increase in politically motivated violence, particularly clashes between TMC supporters and members of the former ruling Left Front. Regular incidents of street fights, attacks on offices and threats to party workers were reported in areas such as North 24 Parganas, Howrah and Burdwan.
Critics accused the TMC government of failing to maintain law and order impartially, with reports suggesting that police forces were often hesitant to intervene against TMC workers. Examples such as alleged targeting of Left Front activists during rallies or protests and violent occupation of local party offices include. Human rights organizations highlighted that police inaction, or selective action against opposition supporters, fostered a climate of fear. This alleged mismanagement undermined public confidence in law enforcement and highlighted concerns about the politicization of the state machinery. While TMC claimed that the violence is the residual effect of the erstwhile Left Front regime, observers argued that the failure to ensure fair policing allowed the new pattern of political violence to continue.
6. Political Retaliatory Attacks – Alleged Involvement Of TMC Workers In Post-Poll Violence
Post-poll violence has repeatedly accused TMC workers, especially in areas where there was a tough fight in the elections. After winning the 2011 assembly elections, there were several reports of retaliatory attacks on political opponents, mainly targeting Left Front activists and independent activists. Eyewitness statements contain detailed examples of intimidation, arson and attacks.
Organizations such as the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) filed several complaints of politically motivated reprisals. Opposition parties accused the TMC government of indirectly supporting these attacks or turning a blind eye to them, creating an environment where retaliation became normal. In some districts, police reports showed that arrests of opposition supporters were disproportionately high, while TMC-linked criminals were often released or charged with nothing. These allegations raised serious questions on the impartiality of Mamata Banerjee’s regime and raised concerns about the democratic functioning in West Bengal, as political vendetta undermines fair competition and discourages dissent.
7. Alleged Bureaucratic Intimidation – Pressure On State Officials For Political Allegiance
Since the beginning of her tenure in 2011, Mamata Banerjee has faced several allegations of pressurizing bureaucrats and administrative officials to demonstrate political allegiance to the Trinamool Congress. Media reports and whistleblower statements described instances where senior officers’ transfers, promotions and postings were influenced by perceived engagement with party interests rather than merit.
Critics argue that this climate fostered a culture of fear in bureaucrats, discouraging fair governance. Reportedly, officials were subject to demotion, harassment or segregation if they did not follow political instructions, especially in cases involving tenders, land acquisition or law enforcement. Many retired bureaucrats have spoken publicly about undue political interference in administrative decision-making, indicating systemic challenges in maintaining neutrality. If such practices are confirmed, they compromise the integrity of state institutions, undermine democratic accountability, and make it easier to perpetuate corruption, as officials are more likely to pursue political interests rather than act in the public interest. Can feel obliged to.
8. Allegations Like Fodder Scam In Bengal – Misuse Of Development Funds
After coming to power in 2011, the Trinamool Congress-led West Bengal government faced several charges such as the infamous Bihar fodder scam. Critics claimed that large-scale development funds allocated for rural infrastructure, agriculture and welfare schemes were being misused. Opposition parties and media reports alleged that funds earmarked for government schemes were diverted to politically affiliated contractors or shell companies, often without adequate tender or monitoring.
For example, reports alleged irregularities in procurement procedures for agricultural inputs, rural electrification projects and irrigation schemes. In many cases, local audits revealed inflated bills, bogus projects and information on payments to contractors with unclear credentials. Its similarity to the Bihar fodder scam lies in the alleged misappropriation of public money for political patronage and personal gain, thereby weakening the results of governance and development. State vigilance department investigations and reports by opposition MPs have cited instances where development schemes designed to benefit marginalized communities were either under-implemented or diverted. Critics argue that this not only deprived the beneficiaries, but also established a culture of impunity among officials affiliated with the ruling party. Although concrete evidence remained limited, these allegations reinforced the perception that the TMC, led by Mamata Banerjee, tolerated the misuse of state resources for political cohesion.
9. Coal Scam Allegations – Irregularities In Coal Transportation And Allocation
In West Bengal, allegations related to coal mismanagement came to light during Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, especially regarding state-controlled coal allocation and transport contracts. Political opponents and media investigations claimed that coal destined for state utilities, power plants, or industrial use was often diverted, sold at high rates, or allocated to private entities with political connections.
A specific concern was linked to the irregular allocation of coal supply contracts, where companies linked to TMC allegedly received preferential treatment. The complaints included cases of contractors hauling coal by charging inflated fees, which raised suspicions of bribery or misappropriation of funds.
Critics also cited delays and inefficiencies in the supply of coal to government power plants, leading to energy shortages, while coal from the same sources is reportedly being sold through informal means. Opposition parties often compared the central government’s coal allocation scams and accused Mamata Banerjee’s administration of inadequate surveillance or tacit collusion. Although direct legal convictions were infrequent, several media reports in 2013-2015 revealed political interference in the allocation of dubious coal deals and contracts. The controversy underlined concerns over the mix of political patronage with resource management, transparency and state-controlled commodity distribution in West Bengal.
10. Chit Fund Regulatory Lapse – Saradha Group’s Expansion Into Political Patronage
The Saradha Group financial scam, which collapsed in 2013, is one of the most notorious controversies involving West Bengal politics. Initially operated as a small-scale chit fund, the group expanded massively, promising high returns to millions of investors, especially rural and semi-urban populations. The investigation revealed that the rapid expansion of Saradha Group was due to regulatory lapses and alleged political patronage of Trinamool Congress leaders.
The allegations included direct financial support to Trinamool Congress campaigns, sponsorship of party events and preferential treatment in enforcement actions. Whistleblower reports and a later CBI investigation revealed that top Saradha officials maintained close ties with influential Trinamool Congress leaders, reportedly securing immunity from regulatory scrutiny.The victims of the Ponzi scheme suffered huge financial losses, estimated at more than ₹2,500 crore, causing nationwide outrage. Public hearings and revelations in the media highlight how the group continued to operate unabated due to political influence, and the government machinery reportedly ignored irregularities in fund-raising, investor protection and financial reporting. Despite criminal proceedings against Saradha officials and some political figures, questions remain about systemic political and regulatory failures that led to such large-scale frauds, and the scam was a major controversy of Mamata Banerjee’s early tenure. Made.
11. Mismanagement Of Transport Subsidies – Irregular Allocation Of Bus Subsidies
Since 2011, the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government has been repeatedly accused of mismanagement of transport subsidies, especially those given for public bus operations and urban transport development. Reports have revealed that subsidies earmarked for private bus operators were often allocated irregularly with the aim of improving rural and urban connectivity, disproportionately benefiting transport owners affiliated to the Trinamool Congress.
Investigation reports have highlighted cases where operators received government funding without improving the services or infrastructure concerned. The charges included inflated claims for bus purchases, fraudulent routes and irregular reimbursement for fuel and maintenance. Opposition parties accused the government of using transport subsidies to reward loyalists and bypass genuine service providers. Some informants claimed that transport department officials were pressured to give priority to operators associated with the Trinamool Congress, resulting in inefficient service coverage and financial irregularities. These allegations were particularly prominent during the period 2012-2015, which coincided with efforts to consolidate political influence in semi-urban districts. The controversy raised widespread concerns about administrative oversight, accountability in public funding allocation, and the intersection of political patronage with service delivery in West Bengal’s transport sector.
12. Corruption In Healthcare Scheme – Bribery In Health Project Funds
During Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, many healthcare initiatives in the state faced allegations of corruption. Critics accused the government of awarding contracts for hospital equipment, health infrastructure and public health campaigns to private companies linked to Trinamool Congress leaders, often in exchange for bribes or political donations.
For example, reports indicated irregularities in the procurement of rural primary health centres, mobile clinics and vaccination campaigns. Media checks revealed that bills for medical equipment and construction projects were overstated, and that additional funds were allegedly given to intermediaries linked to the ruling party. Public interest groups and opposition legislators accused the government of prioritizing political integrity over merit in awarding contracts, which reduced the effectiveness of health plans. In addition, some whistleblowers also alleged bullying of officials who reported irregularities or attempted to correct them. These disputes affected not only the use of funds, but also the quality and accessibility of health services, affecting vulnerable populations. Although official investigations had been initiated in some cases, systemic issues involving transparency, political influence and accountability in health service fund management continued to be of concern.
13. Political Violence In Hooghly – Clashes Between TMC And CPI(M) Supporters
Hooghly district has historically been a politically unstable region of West Bengal, where there have been repeated clashes between TMC supporters and CPI(M) workers. Following the 2011 assembly elections, incidents of violent confrontations increased, with reports of street battering, occupation of offices, and attacks during political rallies.
Media organizations have recorded several instances where opposition leaders claimed that police action was taken selectively, often preventing interference against TMC-linked attackers. Eyewitness statements said arson, threatening local party workers and threatening dissenters. These clashes were particularly pronounced in rural areas, where political allegiance dictated access to welfare schemes and benefits of local administration. Political analysts argued that such violence was not only a legacy of the polarization of the Left Front period, but also a method used by the Trinamool Congress to strengthen grassroots control. Although the Mamata Banerjee government often denied tacit support for such activities, persistent allegations and local grievances underlined concerns of state impartiality, rule of law and normalization of political violence as a weapon to suppress the opposition.
14. Alleged Misuse Of Panchayat Funds – Misallocation In Rural Development
Panchayat funds allocated for rural development, infrastructure and welfare programs came under scrutiny during Mamata Banerjee’s rule. Critics alleged that funds earmarked for villages were misallocated, and were often diverted to projects controlled by contractors or local party workers associated with the Trinamool Congress.
Reports have highlighted cases where panchayat samitis were pressured to approve inflated bills for minor works, or funds were diverted to politically strategic projects, such as Trinamool Congress in areas of high electoral importance. Planted in party offices or infrastructure construction. Media checks in 2012-2016 documented fraudulent projects, incomplete construction works and irregular payments, indicating systemic flaws in accountability. Some local informants accused Trinamool workers of bullying them for questioning fund allocation, indicating a politically charged atmosphere in rural governance. These allegations not only undermined the objectives of rural development but also reinforced the perception that the Trinamool Congress misused state resources for political solidarity rather than public service, leading to transparency, accountability and governance during Mamata Banerjee’s tenure. Extensive questions were raised on morality.
15. Saradha Chit Fund Scam Blast – Scam Worth Thousands Of Crores Exposed; Trinamool Leaders Also Included
Saradha Group’s financial scam, which came to light in 2013, became one of the biggest financial scams in Indian history. Initially operating as a small-scale chit fund in West Bengal, Saradha Group expanded extensively and wooed millions of small investors, especially those from rural and semi-urban areas, by promising high returns. The failure of this plan defrauded investors of more than ₹2,500 crore, causing a widespread social and economic crisis.
The investigation revealed political patronage and the alleged involvement of Trinamool leaders in carrying out the scam. Media reports and a CBI investigation revealed that several political figures had financial ties to this group, and had reportedly received donations and money for campaigning. Questions were raised as to how the state regulatory machinery under the Trinamool Congress rule allowed the Ponzi scam to continue unabated on such a large scale. The scam led to mass protests across West Bengal and victims demanding justice and accountability. There were several arrests, including by top Sharda officials, and the CBI and Enforcement Directorate conducted extensive raids in 2013-2015. Opposition parties accused the Mamata Banerjee government of protecting the leaders involved, citing delay in prosecution and selective law enforcement. The Saradha scam became a symbol of alleged financial corruption linked to political influence in West Bengal, which significantly tarnished the image of the Trinamool Congress at the national level.
16. Charges Begin Over Rose Valley Chit Fund – Another Large-Scale Financial Scandal
Following the Saradha scandal, another large financial institution, the Rose Valley Group, came under investigation for fraudulent activities that began in 2013-2014. The company operated several investment schemes, promising high returns to investors as well as raising funds from millions of residents of West Bengal. The investigation alleged that the group had tacit political support, especially from Trinamool Congress leaders, making it operate for many years without any regulatory interference.
Reports from informants and media investigations highlighted that Rose Valley donated heavily to Trinamool Congress party funds and sponsored political events, creating an influential network that reportedly protected the company from early government interference. When this plan failed, there was an estimated loss of over ₹5,000 crore, affecting investors from West Bengal, Assam and the northeastern states. The Enforcement Directorate, CBI and state vigilance agencies launched an investigation into the company’s operations, which revealed widespread money laundering, misappropriation of funds and fraudulent accounting practices. Critics argue that the repeated emergence of such scams during the Trinamool Congress rule highlights systemic issues such as political patronage, regulatory failure and governance lapses, thereby preventing the financial exploitation of ordinary citizens by the Mamata Banerjee administration. Questions arise on accountability.
17. Narada Sting Controversy Begins – Secret Recording Shows Trinamool Congress Leaders Taking Bribes
The Narada sting operation, carried out in 2014 and publicly revealed in 2016, involved secret recordings of several high-profile Trinamool Congress leaders allegedly posing as businessmen and taking bribes from middlemen. Recordings broadcast by media channels showed leaders allegedly promising political benefits in exchange for large sums of money, leading to serious allegations of corruption.
The dispute became a national political issue, with opposition parties calling for accountability and judicial scrutiny. The Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government was accused of trying to suppress the scam, while the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed cases to investigate the matter in 2016-2017. TMC leaders denied any wrongdoing and claimed that the sting operation was politically motivated, but several recordings found evidence of the transaction, sparking public outrage. The dispute led to lengthy legal proceedings and the arrest of some party leaders in 2017, although many of the accused persons were still wielding significant political power. The Narada sting exposed alleged systemic corruption within the TMC and raised questions over the impact of political patronage in governance, accountability and state-level decision-making.
18. Allegations Of Healthcare Corruption – Mismanagement Of Central Health Grants
During Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, several allegations of mismanagement of central health grants provided by the central government came to light. Reports revealed that irregular allocations of earmarked funds were made to improve public health service infrastructure, purchase of equipment and rural health initiatives, and often benefited contractors associated with TMC leaders.
The test reports highlighted increased procurement costs of medical equipment, poor construction of rural primary health centers and delays in distribution of medicines and vaccines. Opposition parties accused the TMC administration of misusing funds and creating opportunities for bribery, which reduced the quality of healthcare. Whistleblower reports pointed out that bureaucrats were under pressure to approve projects without proper audits, compromising transparency. Media revelations from 2012-2016 emphasized irregularities in government health programs, including alleged rigging of public tenders and preferential allocation of contracts. These allegations were criticized by public interest groups and healthcare workers, who argued that systemic corruption not only deprives citizens of essential services but also reflects governance failures in an area critical to public welfare.
19. Education Scam Allegations – Fake Appointments And Examinations In State Education
Under Mamata Banerjee’s rule, the education sector of West Bengal faced allegations of corruption in appointments, recruitment examinations and scholarship distribution. Post-2013 reports highlighted irregularities in teacher recruitment, claiming that the allocation of posts went to politically preferred candidates rather than merit-based examinations.
Media investigations and opposition complaints cited instances of forged certificates, falsification of examination results and delays in verification of candidates’ certificates. Scholarships and grants earmarked for economically disadvantaged students were reportedly given to persons with political contacts, which reduced the effectiveness of welfare programmes. Several whistleblowers alleged bureaucratic pressure to benefit TMC-affiliated candidates and condone irregularities. These controversies raised concerns about systemic corruption in the education sector, undermining both competence and public confidence. Critics argue that such practices not only compromised educational standards, but also reflected the widespread use of state institutions for political consolidation under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership.
20. Police Atrocities – Law Enforcement Agencies Accused Of Protecting TMC Supporters
Several incidents of political violence in West Bengal, especially after 2011, have raised serious questions about the impartiality of the state police. Opposition parties and human rights organizations have accused law enforcement agencies of protecting TMC workers during violent clashes, attacks on opposition offices and bullying of dissidents.
Reports from districts such as North 24 Parganas, Hooghly and Howrah reported that when TMC supporters were involved in politically motivated violence, the police intervened with or without delay. In contrast, opposition activists faced arrest or harassment even for minor violations. Human rights groups cited the politicization of the police force as a major factor in escalating violence and undermining public confidence in law enforcement. Media coverage and local testimonies indicate that such impunity emboldened TMC workers and created an atmosphere of fear among opposition workers. Although the state government denied systemic bias, repeated allegations revealed that the impartiality of the police was compromised, raising concerns over the rule of law and democratic functioning in Mamata Banerjee’s administration.
21. Political Intimidation Of Journalists – Reports Of Harassment For Critical Reporting
During Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, many journalists and media houses reported harassment and intimidation for critical coverage of Trinamool Congress policies, corruption allegations or political violence. Investigative journalists covering the Saradha scam, Narada sting or local political violence often faced pressure to suppress threats, denial of access or adverse reporting.
Media watchdogs highlighted instances where journalists received anonymous threats, were publicly maligned in pro-Trinamool media, or faced legal notices under defamation laws. Critics argued that such threats stifled press freedom and created a climate of self-censorship, limiting investigative reporting and public accountability. Opposition parties, press associations and human rights organizations expressed concern over a pattern of targeted harassment that seemed to be aimed at controlling the plot that had spread around the Trinamool government. These allegations strengthened the perception that Mamata Banerjee’s administration was trying to strengthen political control not only through the state apparatus, but also by influencing media coverage, thereby undermining the democratic principle of free and independent journalism. going.
22. Result Of Sharda Ponzi Scheme – Victims Demand Justice; TMC Accused Of Protecting Accused Leaders
The collapse of Saradha Group in 2013 led to a huge financial crisis in West Bengal, in which the total accumulated capital of more than 2 million investors went over ₹2,500 crore. The victims, mainly small traders, daily wage laborers and rural families, protested across the state demanding justice. The investigation revealed deep political ties, as several top Sharda officials had allegedly donated to TMC operations and allegedly maintained close contacts with party leaders.
In 2013-2015 the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) were called in to investigate the matter. Opposition parties repeatedly accused the Mamata Banerjee government of protecting TMC leaders involved in promoting the Ponzi scheme. Public hearings and media investigations revealed that state regulatory authorities had ignored early warning signs, leading to the company’s unabated expansion. There were several arrests, but the slow pace of prosecutions further fueled allegations of political interference. The families of the victims demonstrated in Kolkata and district headquarters and exposed the systemic failures of the government. The Saradha scam became a symbol of alleged corruption involving political patronage under Mamata Banerjee, raising questions over accountability and the safety of common citizens from large-scale financial fraud.
23. Rose Valley Scandal Spreads – Allegations Of State Involvement
After Sharda, Rose Valley Group emerged as another big financial scam in 2014, allegedly defrauding investors of more than ₹5,000 crore. Rose Valley operated schemes such as the Ponzi scheme, collecting money from thousands of small investors in West Bengal, Assam and other northeastern states. The media and opposition parties alleged that the Trinamool Congress state government facilitated its operations through political patronage, thereby avoiding regulatory scrutiny by the company.
Investigation by CBI, ED and state vigilance agencies revealed that the group allegedly donated huge amounts to the TMC treasury and created an influential network by sponsoring political events. The money received from investor contributions was allegedly diverted to shell companies and real estate undertakings. The collapse of the Rose Valley plans in 2014-2015 led to widespread social unrest, with investors demanding compensation and justice. Critics argued that the repeated appearance of such scandals in the TMC regime reflected systemic regulatory failure and political interference, which not only harmed investors, but also tarnished West Bengal’s financial governance reputation.
24. Alleged Election Irregularities – TMC Accused Of Booth Capturing
During the 2014 and 2016 general elections, numerous reports and complaints from the opposition exposed alleged electoral irregularities in West Bengal. TMC faced allegations of booth capturing, voter intimidation and rigging of voting processes in districts like North 24 Parganas, Hooghly and Murshidabad.
Witness statements and media checks indicate that TMC workers allegedly coerced voters, obstructed opposition campaigns and influenced polling station officials in favor of party candidates. Opposition parties, including the BJP and the CPI(M), filed a formal complaint with the Election Commission, alleging that violence and intimidation endangered free and fair elections. Although the EC monitored and intervened in some cases, there continued to be sporadic reports of political violence and coercion. Critics argued that such activities reflected TMC’s strategy to strengthen electoral dominance through tactics of undue influence and fear, raising concerns over democratic integrity under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership.
25. Linkage To Bank Loan Fraud – Mismanagement Of Loans By Trinamool Congress-Backed Companies
Financial irregularities involving Trinamool Congress-backed companies became a notable controversy in West Bengal around 2014-2016. Reportedly, several private companies linked to Trinamool Congress leaders obtained large loans from government and national banks but failed to repay them, resulting in non-performing assets (NPAs). Media checks and opposition claims suggested preferential treatment in loan approvals, bypassing standard loan risk assessments.
Reports indicated that some loan amounts were diverted to allegedly unrelated business undertakings or for political purposes, creating a nexus of financial mismanagement and political patronage. Critics accused Mamata Banerjee’s administration of ignoring regulatory safeguards and promoting a culture where politically connected institutions can exploit banking systems with minimum accountability. The controversy highlighted systemic weaknesses in financial oversight, the role of political influence in corporate debt, and the potential misuse of public funds, leading to long-term impacts on the banking sector and the state’s economy.
26. Land Allotment Dispute – Irregular Land Transfer To Party Associates
During Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, allegations of irregular land transfers to party allies and affiliated entities came to light, raising questions on transparency and governance. Reports revealed that government land, including plots earmarked for industrial, agricultural or public welfare purposes, was allotted to politically connected individuals at less than market value or without proper auction.
Investigative media reports and opposition complaints cited instances where TMC-affiliated developers and contractors were benefited by bypassing established procedures in such allocations. Critics argued that this created opportunities for profiteering, reduced fair competition, and denied ordinary citizens or businesses legitimate access to land resources. These allegations were particularly vocal in districts where rapid urban development was taking place, where the value of land had increased significantly. Although Mamata Banerjee’s government denied any wrongdoing, the controversy fueled widespread narratives of political favoritism, administrative irregularities, and possible misuse of state resources to strengthen party influence.
27. Political Violence In North Bengal – Attacks On Opposition Activists
North Bengal, which includes districts such as Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri and Cooch Behar, saw an upsurge in political violence after the 2011 elections and during the state and local elections held thereafter. Workers from opposition parties, especially BJP and CPI(M), reported harassment, physical attacks and intimidation by TMC workers.
Media reports recorded incidents of attacks on political offices, disruption of rallies and pressure on local voters. Human rights organizations and informants alleged that police often failed to intervene impartially, and inaction tended to favor TMC supporters. Critics argue that these methods of violence were aimed at strengthening TMC’s electoral control in strategically important northern districts. These events raised concerns about democratic norms, the safety of opposition activists and the role of state institutions in ensuring fair enforcement of law and order. While Mamata Banerjee’s administration stressed on maintaining peace, frequent reports of politically motivated violence highlighted systemic issues of partisan policing and intimidation in North Bengal.
28. Alleged Misappropriation Of Social Welfare Programs – TMC Loyalists Provided Funds
Allegations emerged that state-administered social welfare programs, including pensions, housing schemes and subsidies, were rigged to benefit TMC loyalists. Investigation reports and opposition complaints highlighted instances where the list of beneficiaries was allegedly reshuffled to include supporters or exclude dissenters.
Media accounts from 2012-2016 revealed irregularities in housing allocation, ration distribution, and cash transfers, with political affiliation determining access to benefits. Whistleblowers described bureaucratic pressure on officials to follow instructions in favor of party-affiliated beneficiaries, which reduced transparency and fairness. Critics argued that such misappropriation not only misappropriated public funds, but also promoted a patronage system that strengthened political allegiance through reliance on welfare. The allegations reinforced widespread concerns about the ethics of governance, equitable development and the role of political bias in state-administered programs under Mamata Banerjee’s rule.
29. Allegations Of Corruption In West Bengal Health Department – Misuse Of Budget For Hospitals And Equipment
Since Mamata Banerjee came to power in 2011, her government has faced repeated allegations of corruption in the health department. Investigative reports and opposition parties accused authorities of misappropriating funds allocated for hospital infrastructure, medical equipment and rural health initiatives. Several media reports highlighted increased procurement costs of medical equipment, incomplete construction of primary and district level health centres and irregular tendering procedures benefiting politically connected contractors.
For example, reports from 2012-2015 indicated that state funds for upgrading rural hospitals were diverted to bogus contractors who gave substandard equipment or delayed completion of the project. Whistleblowers alleged bureaucratic pressure to approve these contracts, while dissenting officers were threatened with transfer or demotion. Critics argued that this mismanagement led to a worsening of healthcare conditions, especially on the rural population dependent on government hospitals. The issue rose to particular prominence during the central government’s distribution of health grants, where the Mamata Banerjee administration was accused of failing to ensure proper utilization and accountability. Although the government denied any wrongdoing, repeated media reports and opposition complaints pointed to systemic weaknesses in financial monitoring and transparency, leading to political interests being prioritized over governance and public welfare in West Bengal’s healthcare sector. Questions arose on giving.
30. Education Recruitment Scams – Alleged Rigging In Teacher Recruitment Examinations
Under the leadership of Mamata Banerjee, the education sector of West Bengal faced serious controversies related to teacher recruitment and academic appointments. Around 2012, allegations of rigging of recruitment exams surfaced, where politically connected candidates were allegedly given biased treatment. Reports suggested that examination results were sometimes falsified, and that merit-based procedures were completely circumvented in some appointments.
Media checks highlighted cases where certificate attestations were falsified, and candidates with alleged political contacts were given priority over qualified applicants. Opposition parties accused the Trinamool Congress government of using these appointments to reward its loyalists, strengthen political influence in local communities and control school administration. Department of Education whistleblowers alleged pressure to approve irregular appointments, and the audit revealed discrepancies in the number of approved and filled positions. These disputes undermined public confidence in the state’s education system, raised concerns about corruption, and damaged the merit-based system, which affected both teachers and students. Critics argue that such irregularities reflect a broader form of governance where political patronage and party allegiance often influence bureaucratic and administrative decisions, reducing transparency and accountability in critical public sectors.
31. Transport Subsidies And Tender Irregularities – Bias In State Contracts
Since 2011, Mamata Banerjee’s administration faced allegations of mismanagement of transport subsidies and state tenders in West Bengal. Several reports have revealed that bus subsidies aimed at improving urban and rural public transport were irregularly allocated to companies that had close political ties to Trinamool Congress leaders. The investigation revealed an increase in project costs, ghost bus routes and payments to operators who did not provide the promised services.
Tender procedures for bus infrastructure and maintenance contracts were allegedly manipulated, benefiting companies linked to the Trinamool Congress and excluding other bidders. Whistleblower statements and reports exposed in the media described bureaucratic pressure on Department of Transportation officials to approve contracts without proper audit or competitive bidding. Critics argued that such favoritism not only misappropriated government funds but also undermined service delivery, resulting in inefficient transportation networks in many districts. Opposition parties repeatedly raised these issues and emphasized how subsidies and tenders were used to strengthen political loyalty rather than public welfare. Although Mamata Banerjee’s government often denied any wrongdoing, the controversies pointed to systemic weaknesses of transparency, accountability and ethical governance in West Bengal’s transport sector.
32. Political Violence In Howrah And Hooghly – Attack On Opposition Activists
After Mamata Banerjee came to power in 2011, there were repeated incidents of political violence in districts like Howrah and Hooghly. Opposition workers, especially CPI(M) and BJP workers, reported harassment, attacks and attacks on party offices by Trinamool Congress workers. Media coverage for 2012-2015 noted incidents of arson, physical intimidation and disruption of rallies and gatherings.
Eyewitness statements indicated that the police often acted selectively, either remaining inactive during attacks by Trinamool supporters or unnecessarily targeting opposition members. Critics argued that this method of violence was to strengthen Trinamool Congress’s ground control and intimidate dissenters. Reports from human rights organizations highlighted the dangers faced by political activists in these districts, and emphasized the erosion of democratic norms and the culture of fear that grew out of political partisanship. Although the Mamata Banerjee government claimed that law and order was fairly maintained, persistent complaints and local reports revealed that politically motivated violence and selective law enforcement in Howrah and Hooghly had led to systemic problems.
33. Saradha Case: Political Patronage – Criticism Of Slow Investigation
The Saradha Group’s Ponzi scheme, which failed in 2013, attracted national attention and widespread outrage. Critics repeatedly argued that the investigation was delayed due to political influence, as several TMC leaders were reportedly involved. While the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate launched the investigation, opposition parties claimed that the TMC government actively protected high-profile politicians from the initial investigation, thereby slowing down the process of arrest and prosecution.
Media reports highlighted how bureaucrats and investigating officers faced obstacles or pressure while trying to trace leads involving people associated with TMC. The slow pace of legal action and delays in the recovery of victims’ assets further inflamed public anger. Parliamentary committees and human rights organizations raised questions about the role of political protection in obstructing justice. The controversy underlined concerns about the impact of political power on governance, accountability and regulatory and investigative processes in West Bengal, reinforcing the statement that Mamata Banerjee’s administration protected certain individuals at the cost of public trust.
34. Alleged Misappropriation Of Cooperatives – Party Leaders Accused Of Controlling Local Cooperatives
During Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, several reports emerged regarding misappropriation of cooperative societies in West Bengal. The allegations revealed that TMC leaders exerted influence on local cooperatives, including agriculture, credit and housing societies, to misuse resources and strengthen financial power. Media investigations uncovered cases where cooperative funds were redirected to projects allegedly involving the party, members were removed due to political disagreements, and management committees were rigged to ensure loyalty.
Critics argued that such practices undermined the democratic and financial functioning of cooperatives, depriving lay members of legitimate benefits. The perceived control over these local entities allowed TMCs to build networks of political patronage, influence grassroots governance, and access financial resources without transparency. Opposition parties and local informants raised concerns about the misuse of cooperative funds for personal or political gain, and emphasized systemic weaknesses in monitoring. These allegations reflect the widespread form of governance in West Bengal under the leadership of Mamata Banerjee, where state resources and local institutions were misused to strengthen the party’s dominance.
35. Public Release Of Narada Sting Operation – Trinamool Congress Leaders Accused Of Allegedly Taking Bribe
The Narada sting operation, conducted secretly in 2014 and publicly released in 2016, had created a major political storm in West Bengal. The recording allegedly showed several senior Trinamool Congress leaders, posing as businessmen and taking bribes from middlemen, in exchange for political gains and influence in the selection of candidates in the upcoming elections. Videos broadcast by national and regional media showed discussions involving cash transactions and assurances of political patronage, sparking widespread outrage.
The controversy escalated when opposition parties, especially BJP and CPI(M), demanded judicial intervention and immediate action against those involved. The Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government denied any wrongdoing, claiming that the videos were tampered with and politically motivated. In response, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed cases in 2016-2017 to investigate the allegations. Some party leaders were arrested, although the investigation dragged on, with legal challenges and political lobbying delaying progress. The Narada sting highlighted concerns of corruption rife in TMC’s political machinery, raising questions over ethical governance, transparency in political funding and accountability in candidate selection processes. The scandal also fueled a national debate about the influence of money in politics, especially in state-level party operations.
36. Bank Loan Fraud Cases Involving Trinamool Congress – Big Loans Given To Fake Companies
Between 2014 and 2017, reports emerged of alleged mismanagement of large-scale bank loans by companies linked to Trinamool Congress leaders. The investigation revealed that many shell companies, often associated with party-affiliated people or political donors, received heavy credit facilities from both government and private banks. These companies often defaulted on repayment obligations, creating a large pool of non-performing assets (NPAs) and raising suspicions of political bias.
Media checks exposed irregularities in loan approvals, including circumventing standard loan assessments and ignoring risk assessments. Whistleblowers claimed that some officials at banks were pressured to approve loans to politically connected people, while ordinary businesses faced stiff scrutiny. The controversy exposed systemic weaknesses in financial governance and regulatory oversight in West Bengal, raising questions about the ethical responsibilities of both political leaders and banking institutions. Opposition parties repeatedly raised these issues in Parliament and in public forums, stressing how political patronage can be linked to financial misconduct, undermining public confidence in the banking sector and financial institutions.
37. Rose Valley Chit Fund Scam Deepens – TMC Ministers And Mps Accused
Another big Ponzi scheme in West Bengal, Rose Valley Group, collapsed in 2014-2015, allegedly defrauding investors of more than ₹5,000 crore. The investigation revealed alleged political patronage by TMC ministers and MPs, who were accused of protecting the company and making its operations possible despite regulatory violations. The scam attracted nationwide attention, as investors lost their life savings and led to widespread protests in West Bengal and the northeastern states.
Media reports indicated that Rose Valley made substantial contributions to TMC’s election campaigns and sponsored political events, creating an influential network that allegedly hindered the early detection of fraudulent activities. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) and CBI launched an investigation in 2015, uncovering financial irregularities, money laundering and misappropriation of funds. Opposition parties criticized the Mamata Banerjee government for failing to take timely action against the guilty leaders, and argued that the delay in the investigation reflected political patronage. The Rose Valley scam became a symbol of systemic corruption and financial exploitation under the Trinamool Congress rule, highlighting the interrelationship of politics, financial fraud and governance lapses in West Bengal.
38. Political Violence During Kolkata Elections – Attacks On Opposition Campaigners
Several incidents of election-related violence took place during Mamata Banerjee’s tenure in Kolkata, the political center of West Bengal. In the 2014 general elections and subsequent municipal elections, opposition campaigners, especially those of the BJP and CPI(M), reported harassment, physical assaults and attacks on campaign offices by Trinamool Congress workers. Media coverage noted incidents of road jams, voter intimidation and threats to prevent opposition rallies from going ahead.
Eyewitness statements show that law enforcement agencies often failed to act impartially, taking selective action against opposition activists, while Trinamool Congress supporters faced minimal consequences. Human rights organizations highlighted the political use of violence as a political weapon to strengthen party dominance, especially in key constituencies in Kolkata and surrounding districts. Mamata Banerjee’s government publicly claimed to maintain law and order, but persistent reports continued to indicate systemic problems in policing, political patronage and selective enforcement, raising concerns about democratic fairness and the safety of political participants in West Bengal.
39. Healthcare Equipment Purchase Scam – Alleged Over-Invoicing
Reports from 2014-2016 indicated alleged over-invoicing and irregularities in the procurement of healthcare equipment under Mamata Banerjee’s rule. Media investigations and whistleblower statements have shown that tenders for medical equipment, hospital infrastructure, and rural health programs were often awarded to contractors with political affiliations, increasing the cost of the project.
Specific allegations included inflated bills for hospital machinery, the purchase of substandard medical equipment, and non-adherence to proper tender procedures. Opposition parties accused the government of misappropriating public funds through these irregularities and compromising the quality of healthcare provided to citizens, especially in rural districts. These allegations reflect widespread concerns over accountability in state-funded health programs and the potential abuse of political influence to benefit affiliated contractors. Although Mamata Banerjee’s government denied any wrongdoing, repeated reports and investigations highlighted systemic administrative challenges in healthcare procurement in West Bengal.
40. Irregularities In Panchayat Elections – Opposition’s Claims Of Vote Rigging
Panchayat elections in West Bengal, especially during 2013-2018, were surrounded by allegations of irregularities and vote manipulation. Opposition parties accused TMC workers of influencing voter lists, putting pressure on local officials and creating irregularities at the booth level to achieve electoral victory.
Media reports and eyewitness statements highlighted strategies such as threatening opposition supporters, loyalists casting more than one vote, and coercion during vote counting. Human rights and election monitoring groups documented cases of harassment of election officials trying to report irregularities. Critics argued that such practices undermined the democratic process at the grassroots level and strengthened TMC’s control over rural governance structures. Although Mamata Banerjee’s administration said the elections were conducted fairly, the continued allegations indicated systemic flaws in electoral transparency and accountability, raising concerns about democratic integrity in West Bengal’s panchayat system.
41. FIR Registered In Narada Sting Case – Police Filed Charge Sheets Against TMC Leaders
After the Narada sting video became public in 2016, law enforcement agencies were under immense pressure to take legal action against the involved TMC leaders. As of 2017, the West Bengal Police, under pressure from the CBI and PILs, filed several FIRs that accused high-ranking ministers and party leaders. These primaries were accused of taking large sums of money to influence political decisions, selection of candidates, and party operations.
Filing the FIR was controversial. Opposition parties criticized the state police for delays and favuritism, arguing that political influence slowed the investigation. Media coverage showed that despite the FIRs, enforcement action was limited, and many of the accused still held positions of power. The legal proceedings became longer and longer, and several petitions were filed in the Calcutta High Court to ensure a proper investigation. The case highlighted systemic challenges in striking a balance between political influence, law enforcement impartiality and judicial oversight. It received national attention in 2017-2018, when political analysts said that the Narada case is an example of deepening the roots of corruption in West Bengal and mixing wealth and politics. Although Mamata Banerjee and the Trinamool Congress denied any wrongdoing, strict public surveillance remained, further raising concerns about accountability in the state’s political leadership.
42. Bank Loan Mismanagement Controversy Continues – High-Profile Cases
Since 2015, disputes related to mismanagement of bank loans in West Bengal continued unabated, especially involving Trinamool leaders and their associated companies. Reports have shown that many shell companies and politically linked entities obtained large loans from government and national banks without proper credit assessment, thereby increasing non-performing assets (NPAs).
The investigation revealed cases where loans granted for commercial development or industrial expansion were diverted, allegedly for unrelated or speculative purposes. Media reports and opposition parties accused the Mamata Banerjee government of giving preference to companies associated with the party. These cases raised concerns about regulatory oversight, accountability of banking officials, and the impact of political patronage in financial decisions. This mismanagement led to public criticism and parliamentary debate, with a strong emphasis on the systemic risks posed to the financial institutions of West Bengal. Critics argued that such irregularities not only endangered public funds but also strengthened corruption networks, further strengthening political influence in the state’s financial system.
43. Political Threats To Bureaucrats – Reports Of Transfer And Manipulation Of Postings
Since 2011, several reports and whistleblower reports have revealed that bureaucrats from West Bengal faced political intimidation under Mamata Banerjee’s administration. Reportedly, transfers, postings and promotions were rigged to reward loyalty to the Trinamool Congress or to punish officials who disagreed.
The 2014-2017 media investigations highlighted cases where senior IAS officers were suddenly transferred for opposing political instructions or exposing corruption, while politically compliant officers were promoted to sensitive positions.
Such interference reportedly undermined administrative autonomy, instilled fear in bureaucrats and affected the efficiency of governance. Opposition parties, civil service associations and human rights organizations raised concerns over the politicization of bureaucracy, arguing that it impeded transparency and accountability in state governance. Critics stressed that this system of political intimidation allowed party leaders to strengthen control over policy-making, regulatory enforcement and public service delivery, which increased TMC’s influence, while reducing administrative neutrality.
44. Allegations Of Land Grabbing In Kolkata – TMC Leader Accused
In Kolkata, especially during 2013-2016, several allegations of irregular land acquisition involving TMC leaders and their associates came to light. Reports revealed that government land, often reserved for urban development, public welfare or industrial use, was allegedly transferred to politically connected individuals at prices lower than the market or through unclear procedures.
Media investigations and opposition complaints recorded instances where land deals circumvented proper auctions, violated environmental or zoning norms, or put pressure on local residents. Critics argued that such irregularities allowed party leaders to make economic profits while undermining urban planning, transparency, and equitable land distribution. The controversy fueled public protests in the affected neighborhoods, and civil society organizations highlighted abuses of state power for private gain. Although the TMC administration denied involvement, continued media coverage reinforced perceptions of political bias, governance irregularities and exploitation of state resources for personal or party gain.
45. Alleged Misuse Of Central Schemes – Misuse Of Funds Earmarked For Poor Families
During Mamata Banerjee’s tenure, allegations of misuse of central government funds earmarked for welfare schemes for poor families came to light. Reports revealed that subsidies, pensions and housing benefits were allocated irregularly, often benefiting TMC loyalists and excluding intended beneficiaries. The media revealed cases where official beneficiary lists were manipulated, funds were given to politically affiliated contractors, and programme audits were ignored or delayed.
Opposition parties criticized the state government for undermining the objectives of schemes like National Social Assistance Programme, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana and health related grants. Civil society organizations argued that such practices not only misappropriated public funds, but also created a culture of patronage and dependency while strengthening political allegiance at the expense of genuine public welfare. These allegations further reinforced widespread concerns about accountability, transparency and governance ethics under Mamata Banerjee’s administration.
46.Political Violence During Local Protests – Suppression Of Dissent By TMC Workers
Since 2012, there were several local protests in West Bengal over land acquisition, environmental issues and labour disputes, during which TMC workers were accused of suppressing dissent through violence. Media reports and eyewitness statements recorded incidents of physical attacks on protesters, disruption of rallies and intimidation of community leaders protesting TMC’s policies.
Human rights organizations and opposition parties highlighted patterns of selective law enforcement, where police either remained inactive during attacks by TMC supporters or targeted dissenters. Events in districts such as North 24 Parganas, Howrah and Hooghly attracted national attention, emphasizing the risks faced by citizens trying to exercise their democratic rights. Critics argued that such political violence was systematically used to strengthen party control, silence the opposition, and maintain dominance in local governance structures. While Mamata Banerjee’s government claimed to maintain law and order, repeated reports of violence and intimidation indicated systemic issues with governance, political patronage and protection of dissenting voices.
47. Sharda And Rose Valley Cases Continue – Victims Protest For Justice
The Saradha Group and Rose Valley financial scams, which came to light between 2013 and 2015, caused huge losses to millions of investors, especially from West Bengal and the northeastern states. Despite the investigation being initiated by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the victims repeatedly protested against the delay in justice. Public demonstrations in Kolkata and district headquarters highlighted the plight of those who lost their life savings, pensions and earnings, and demanded accountability from both companies and political leaders allegedly associated with them.
The Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress government was accused by opposition parties and civil society organizations of obstructing the investigation or protecting the accused leaders. Media reports revealed the names of high-level politicians receiving donations or financial benefits from these groups, raising concerns of conflict of interest and political influence over law enforcement agencies. The legal proceedings had been slow, fuelled by numerous petitions, appeals and political lobbying, further increasing the frustration of the victims. Analysts argue that the continuous delays reflect the weaknesses of accountability and governance in the Trinamool Congress rule, and the repeated inability to take timely action is undermining public confidence. These cases became symbols of corruption associated with politics in West Bengal, revealing how large-scale financial fraud could continue under alleged political patronage.
48. Narada Case Investigation Stalled – Criticism Over Selective Enforcement
After the Narada sting video was released in 2016, investigations into alleged bribery and political corruption were significantly delayed. Critics argued that law enforcement agencies, including the West Bengal Police and later the CBI, carried out selective enforcement, and that high-profile Trinamool Congress leaders remained in influential positions despite being named in the sting.
Legal and bureaucratic obstacles as well as petitions to the Calcutta High Court slowed arrests and prosecutions. Opposition parties and civil society groups accused Mamata Banerjee’s administration of influencing the police and administrative machinery to obstruct the investigation. The sting’s going public sparked national outrage, raising questions about political funding and the ethical and legal aspects of candidate selection. Analysts reported that such delays and political lobbying undermined public confidence in judicial and investigative institutions. The Narada case became a major symbol of the challenges of holding members of the ruling party in West Bengal accountable, demonstrating how political power can affect both legal processes and public perception.
49. Alleged Recruitment Scam In Police Department – Irregularities In Recruitment
Between 2015 and 2017, multiple reports and whistleblower statements indicated irregularities in the recruitment process of the Police Department of West Bengal. The allegations included falsification of examination results, favouritism in appointments and deliberate hiring of candidates with political affiliations, to the detriment of the merit-based recruitment process.
Media investigations recorded instances where allegedly successful candidates were replaced or sidelined and Trinamool Congress loyalists were appointed. Opposition parties argued that the practice threatened professionalism and impartiality within the police force, undermining the integrity of law enforcement. Reports also indicated that senior officials opposed to political interference were transferred or subjected to disciplinary action, further raising concerns of bureaucratic manipulation of political pressure. These recruitment irregularities reflect a broader pattern of patronage within the Mamata Banerjee administration, showing how political influence can infiltrate important state institutions responsible for law, order and governance. The controversy emphasized the long-term effects of politicized recruitment, including loss of public confidence, declining morale among officers, and potential inefficiencies in policing.
50. Irregularities In Land Allotment In Howrah – Favoritism Towards Party Colleagues
In Howrah, West Bengal, allegations of irregular land allotment between 2014 and 2017 surfaced. Reports revealed that land earmarked for public infrastructure, industrial development or housing schemes was reportedly allocated at below-market rates to individuals and businesses associated with TMC, bypassing legal procedures and competitive bidding.
Investigative media and opposition claims highlighted several cases where government land transfers ignored zoning laws or environmental clearances, leading to speculative gains for party loyalists. Residents of affected areas protested, alleging coercion and inadequate compensation, further intensifying public scrutiny. Critics argued that these irregularities reflected systemic bias in Mamata Banerjee’s rule, raising questions about governance ethics, transparency and equitable distribution of state resources. Despite official denials, frequent media coverage and legal petitions kept the issue in public discussion, revealing the recurring controversy surrounding land administration in West Bengal.
51. Political Violence Against BJP Workers – Several Attacks Reported
During 2014-2019 in West Bengal, there was a significant increase in political violence targeting BJP workers, especially in districts like North 24 Parganas, Hooghly and Kolkata. Reports have mentioned incidents of attacks on offices by TMC workers, disruptions in rallies and harassing party workers. A media investigation uncovered details of physical attacks, sabotage and intimidation aimed at discouraging opposition participation by eyewitnesses.
Human rights organizations and opposition leaders alleged selective police inaction and claimed that law enforcement often failed to intervene impartially. Such incidents created a climate of fear among opposition activists, affecting democratic processes and freedom of political expression. Analysts said the attacks were part of a broader pattern of strengthening TMC’s influence and suppressing dissent, especially during high-stakes elections. While Mamata Banerjee’s government stressed on maintaining law and order, repeated reports indicated systematic issues of political violence and selective enforcement in favor of supporters of the ruling party.
52. Mismanagement Of State Disaster Relief Fund – Corruption In Flood Relief Distribution
West Bengal has historically been vulnerable to floods and cyclones, and under Mamata Banerjee’s rule, particularly between 2015 and 2018, allegations of corruption in the distribution of disaster relief funds surfaced. Reports indicated irregularities in the allocation and utilization of state and central relief funds for flood-affected districts, including North 24 Parganas, Murshidabad and Nadia.
Investigation reports have revealed instances of increase in project costs, misuse of funds to contractors associated with Trinamool Congress and delay in providing assistance to affected communities. Opposition parties and media reports claimed that distribution of relief materials, financial aid and rehabilitation projects was carried out selectively, often benefiting party loyalists, while neglecting the marginalized and those who leaned towards the opposition. Whistleblowers noted bureaucratic pressure to follow political instructions, resulting in inefficient disaster management and increased vulnerability of affected citizens. Critics argued that such practices undermined the state’s emergency preparedness, violated moral governance standards, and reflected the systematic misuse of public funds under Mamata Banerjee’s rule.
53. Lok Sabha Election Allegations – 2019 General Elections
During the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress faced widespread allegations of electoral malpractices, especially in parts of North Bengal, Hooghly and Kolkata. Opposition parties, especially the BJP, alleged that the Trinamool Congress indulged in booth capturing, voter intimidation and rigging of voting processes to achieve favorable results. Reports from election observers and media coverage recorded instances of aggressive mobilization by Trinamool workers at polling stations in both rural and urban constituencies, harassing opposition supporters and attempts to influence voters.
Critics alleged that the ruling party abused the administrative machinery to swing the electoral fray in its favor, using local government officials, law enforcement officials, and party loyalists to track or manipulate voter behavior. Specific charges included pre-determined ballot distribution, pressure on election staff, and disruption of opposition campaigns. The EC received numerous complaints, some of which were investigated, although official results often pointed out the absence of concrete evidence for punitive action. Analysts stressed that such allegations reflect a widespread trend of political governance in West Bengal, where party influence extends to administrative and electoral processes. Although Mamata Banerjee denied all the allegations, insisting that the elections were held fairly, these claims fueled debate over democratic integrity, transparency and the role of political influence in the election results in the state.
54. Political Violence During Elections – Clashes Between TMC And Opposition
There has been repeated political violence in West Bengal, especially during the election season. In the 2019 general elections and previous state-level elections, several incidents of clashes between TMC supporters and opposition activists, especially those from BJP and CPI(M), were reported. Media reports and eyewitness statements recorded incidents of attacks on party workers, vandalism of campaign offices and intimidation of voters.
Observers reported that violence often escalated around polling stations and public meetings, and that both sides accused each other of launching attacks. Human rights organizations highlighted selective enforcement of the law by local police, who were accused of either remaining inactive during attacks by TMC supporters or inexplicably targeting opposition activists. These violent events created a climate of fear, suppressed free political expression and undermined the democratic process. Analysts argue that such behavior allowed TMC to strengthen its power at the grassroots level, maintain control over disputed areas and intimidate dissenting voices. Despite official claims of maintaining law and order, repeated reports indicated systemic problems in policing and governance, reflecting a widespread pattern of politically motivated violence in Mamata Banerjee’s administration.
55. Sharda And Rose Valley Cases Continue – Alleged Political Patronage
The Saradha Group and Rose Valley Ponzi scandals, which had come to prominence in 2013-2015, continued to generate controversy due to slow legal proceedings. The victims and opposition parties alleged that TMC leaders were being given political patronage, thereby delaying justice. The CBI and ED investigation faced bureaucratic and legal hurdles, with petitions, political lobbying and administrative delays prolonging the case’s timeframe.
Media reports highlighted that several high-profile TMC leaders named in the investigation remain in influential positions, indicating possible interference or obstruction in the judicial process. The victims protested in West Bengal and the northeastern states, demanding recovery of property and prosecution of the accused persons.
Parliamentary committees and PILs criticized the state government for failing to deliver timely justice, arguing that political reasons influenced investigation priorities. The slow pace of proceedings further reinforced concerns of political power entanglement with regulatory and enforcement agencies, undermining public confidence in the regime. Analysts considered the continuous delays as a symptom of systemic patronage to influential political figures, indicating how corruption and politics were interconnected in West Bengal during Mamata Banerjee’s tenure.
56. Alleged Misuse Of Welfare Schemes During Elections
During the 2016-2019 election cycles, allegations emerged that state-funded welfare schemes, including Kanyashree, Sabuj Sathi and other social assistance programs, were misused for political purposes by the Trinamool Congress. Critics claimed that government resources earmarked for educational support, bicycles and stipends for girls were selectively distributed to constituencies critical to electoral gains.
Media investigations reported that beneficiaries in opposition-leaning areas often faced delays or were excluded, while areas dominated by Trinamool supporters were given priority. Opposition parties alleged that the timing of the distribution programs was strategically scheduled to coincide with the election campaigns, giving political benefits to Mamata Banerjee and her candidates. Whistleblowers described bureaucratic pressure to ensure compliance with political objectives, undermining the impartiality of the state welfare administration. Analysts argued that such practices blurred the line between governance and election campaigning, raising ethical concerns about the use of government funds to strengthen political allegiance. Despite official denials, the controversy has highlighted repeated debates over accountability, transparency and electoral fairness in Mamata Banerjee’s rule.
57. Allegations Of Bullying By Police And Bureaucracy
Reports from 2014-2019 indicated systematic political pressure on West Bengal Police and bureaucrats in Mamata Banerjee’s administration. Opposition parties claimed that officials were forced to favor TMC candidates, manipulate appointments and influence election results. The media and whistleblowers documented instances of transfers, sudden disciplinary action, and reluctance to investigate complaints involving TMCs.
Analysts argued that such threats undermined the independence of law enforcement and civil administration, creating a culture where officials acted according to political instructions rather than impartial governance. Human rights organizations highlighted the negative impact on officials who opposed the intervention, noting that career insecurity and threats reduced institutional accountability. Critics emphasized that these practices threatened electoral fairness, integrity of law enforcement, and bureaucratic neutrality, reflecting the broader pattern of political governance in West Bengal. Although TMC denied direct involvement, repeated reports and official complaints indicate a continuing culture of influence and pressure within state entities.
58. Covid-19 Relief Fund Controversy
During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021, the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government faced allegations of misuse of relief funds earmarked for pandemic-affected families. Media reports and opposition parties claimed that funds allocated for emergency food rations, cash transfers and assistance to vulnerable populations were allegedly given to individuals and groups associated with TMC.
The controversy centered around the distribution of state and central funds earmarked to assist daily wage labourers, migrant laborers and economically weaker sections. Several whistleblowers reported irregularities including increases in the list of beneficiaries, delayed payments to actual beneficiaries and preferential treatment of TMC loyalists. Critics argued that this selective allocation undermined the response to the pandemic and deepened socio-economic inequalities. Opposition leaders demanded audit of the use of relief funds and transparency in the procurement and distribution mechanism.
Analysts said mismanagement and alleged misuse of funds during the pandemic reflected systemic weaknesses in governance and accountability under the Trinamool Congress rule. While Mamata Banerjee defended the government’s pandemic response, stressed logistics challenges and massive relief efforts, repeated media checks and public protests highlighted concerns of corruption and inefficiency. The controversy further intensified the debate over the ethical use of public resources during the crisis and the interrelationships of politics and welfare administration in West Bengal.
59. Mismanagement In The Health Sector
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed serious administrative lapses in the health sector of West Bengal. Between March 2020 and mid-2021, shortages of oxygen cylinders, hospital beds, ventilators and vaccines were reported in hospitals across the state. Reports have revealed that these shortcomings were compounded by state-level negligence, bureaucratic inefficiency and alleged corruption in procurement and distribution.
The checks revealed delays in the purchase of medical supplies, inadequate storage and over-reliance on last-minute orders. Opposition parties and civil society organizations claimed that political favoritism affected the allocation of resources, with areas dominated by the Trinamool Congress given priority while opposition-leaning districts faced shortages. Media reports also cited inflated bills and questionable tender procedures for hospital equipment and oxygen supplies.
The health sector crisis became particularly severe during the second wave of COVID-19 in April – May 2021, when there were reports of patient deaths due to lack of oxygen. Analysts argue that it exposed the failures of structural governance and raised questions about accountability within Mamata Banerjee’s administration. While the state government stressed logistics challenges during the unprecedented health emergency, persistent allegations of mismanagement and corruption tarnished public perception of the response to the pandemic in West Bengal.
60. Political Violence In North And South Bengal
During the COVID-19 pandemic, TMC was accused of using pandemic restrictions as a pretext to suppress opposition protests, especially in districts of North Bengal such as Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri and districts of South Bengal including Howrah and Hooghly. Reports documented attacks on opposition workers, disruptions in political rallies and incidents of TMC workers harassing party workers.
Human rights organizations highlighted the selective implementation of Covid protocols and claimed that TMC supporters were allowed to hold large gatherings, while opposition meetings were often disrupted. Opposition parties, especially the BJP and CPI(M), criticized the state government for curbing democratic rights and using public health restrictions as a tool of political repression. Media coverage underscored that these clashes often involved intimidation, physical attacks and sabotage, creating a climate of fear among opposition supporters. Analysts said the combination of emergency powers and political mobilization associated with the pandemic gave TMC an opportunity to strengthen local dominance, raise concerns over electoral fairness and suppress dissenting voices in both rural and urban constituencies.
61. Misallocation Of State Funds
Between 2020 and 2021, several allegations of misallocation of state funds came to light in West Bengal under the Mamata Banerjee government. Reports indicate that funds earmarked for healthcare, disaster management and welfare schemes were reportedly given to contractors, organizations and local bodies that had close ties to the Trinamool Congress.
Media investigations revealed instances of increased project costs, bogus beneficiaries in welfare programmes and politically motivated prioritization of funding allocations. Opposition parties alleged that such practices not only jeopardized effective governance but also strengthened the network of party loyalty, diverting resources from actual public welfare needs. Human rights and accountability organizations criticized the administration for its lack of transparency, inadequate auditing, and weak monitoring mechanisms, arguing that systemic corruption and favoritism undermined the equitable distribution of state resources. Analysts stressed that misallocation of funds during crises such as floods and the COVID-19 pandemic had both ethical and operational consequences, affecting vulnerable populations as well as strengthening political influence in favor of the Trinamool Congress.
62. Alleged Corruption In State Procurement
During the COVID-19 crisis in 2020-2021, emergency procurement of personal protective equipment (PPE), masks, sanitizers and other medical supplies in West Bengal was reportedly affected by overbilling, favouritism and corruption. Media reports highlighted increased contract prices, selection of politically connected suppliers and delays in supply of essential commodities to hospitals and frontline workers.
Statements by informants show that standard tender rules were ignored in the procurement processes, leading to suspicion of financial mismanagement and unethical profits of businesses linked to the Trinamool Congress. Opposition parties criticized the state government for failing to ensure transparency and accountability during the unprecedented health emergency. Analysts said such procurement irregularities not only weakened the effectiveness of handling the pandemic but also reflected the weaknesses of systemic governance under Mamata Banerjee’s rule, which could have long-term impacts on public confidence in health governance. The investigation and media investigation stressed the need for strict monitoring mechanisms, timely audits and de-politicization of emergency procurement procedures to prevent misuse of public funds.
63. West Bengal Assembly Election Violence (March – April 2021)
The 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections, held in eight phases between March and April, were marred by widespread reports of political violence. Media and eyewitness statements recorded reports of clashes between TMC supporters and opposition workers, especially workers from BJP, Congress and Left parties. These incidents included attacks on offices, damage to property and physical attacks on party workers during rallies and public meetings.
Opposition parties accused TMC workers of systematically threatening, harassing and coercing voters at polling stations. Reports have revealed that in some areas, especially in North and South Bengal, opposition activists were forced to vacate areas or faced threats of violence to stop election campaigning. Human rights organizations stressed that such incidents created a climate of fear, affecting freedom of expression and the democratic process. Analysts argue that this pattern of election-time violence reflects a long-standing political culture in the state, where the ruling party allegedly took advantage of its local influence and administrative apparatus to maintain dominance. Despite official claims by Mamata Banerjee and TMC to maintain law and order, repeated reports of violent clashes highlighted systemic challenges in ensuring fairness and safety of voters during the elections.
64. Complaints Of The Election Commission
During the 2021 assembly elections, the Election Commission of India received several complaints against TMC for allegedly using government resources and machinery for party purposes. These complaints included allegations of deploying administrative officials, police and government vehicles to assist TMC’s operations, which is prohibited under the Model Code of Conduct.
Media reports and opposition parties claimed that pressure was put on district officials and local bureaucrats to ensure election results favorable to TMC. Specific allegations included facilitating rallies, providing security benefits to TMC’s programs and influencing voter lists in strategically important constituencies. Several petitions were filed with the Election Commission seeking investigation and punitive action against the alleged violations. Although some corrective measures were taken, opposition leaders argued that enforcement was inconsistent and lacked rigour. Analysts said such practices have raised serious concerns over the impartiality of election administration in West Bengal, further reinforcing the perception that political influence extends deep into the bureaucratic framework. Despite Mamata Banerjee’s denial, the controversy has highlighted the current challenge of keeping state resources separate from party interests during elections.
65. Continuation Of Narada Sting Case
The Narada sting case, first revealed in 2016, remained a major controversy in 2021. TMC leaders repeatedly questioned the impartiality of the investigation being conducted by the CBI and other agencies. There were allegations in this case that high-ranking TMC officials took bribes to influence the selection of candidates, party operations and political decisions.
Over the years, legal proceedings were protracted by numerous petitions, administrative delays and political lobbying. Opposition parties frequently criticized the TMC for allegedly obstructing or attempting to delay justice, claiming that many of the accused continued to wield political influence despite being implicated. The media investigation emphasized that the slow pace of the investigation had undermined public confidence in accountability mechanisms. Analysts argued that the case highlighted systemic issues in law enforcement, especially when political elites were involved, reflecting widespread concerns about corruption, abuse of power and patronage of influential party members under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership. The Narada case remained the focus of discussion on political morality and governance in West Bengal.
66. Political Vendetta After The Elections
After the announcement of the results of the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections, opposition parties alleged that TMC workers carried out well-planned attacks on BJP, Congress and Left activists. Reports highlighted incidents of attacks on political offices, vandalism of vehicles and harassment of activists in several districts, including North 24 Parganas, Hooghly and Howrah.
Eyewitness statements suggest that the post-election violence was not spontaneous, but organized, aimed at strengthening TMC’s dominance and intimidating opposition members. Human rights organizations and media coverage recorded police delays or inadequate responses, raising concerns over the impartiality of law enforcement in politically sensitive situations. Analysts argued that such reprisals reflected a pattern of strengthening party dominance through coercion and intimidation, which undermined democratic norms and electoral accountability. Despite claims by the TMC leadership to maintain law and order, repeated incidents of post-poll violence exposed structural weaknesses in governance and political accountability in West Bengal.
67. Allegations Of Covid Fund Mismanagement
During 2020-2021, allegations of mismanagement or misappropriation of funds allocated for Covid-19 relief occurred continuously in West Bengal. Media investigations and opposition reports revealed that emergency relief funds, including cash transfers, medical supplies and welfare assistance, were allocated selectively, and often benefited sectors and individuals loyal to TMC.
Informants reported inflated bills, misallocation of medical equipment, and delays in the distribution of aid money to populations in need. Analysts argued that such practices undermined both the public health response and social equity during the pandemic. Critics emphasized that administrative lapses and perceived political favoritism undermined the effectiveness of state interventions and undermined public confidence. Despite Mamata Banerjee defending her government’s pandemic measures, the ongoing investigation stressed ethical concerns over governance, transparency and proper use of public funds during the crisis.
68. Irregularities In The Education Sector
Between 2016 and 2021, several allegations related to irregularities in the education sector of West Bengal were reported. Reports have revealed that recruitment of government school teachers, administrative staff and examination officers was often rigged to benefit Trinamool Congress loyalists.
Media scrutiny and opposition claims revealed instances of appointments with political influence, bypassing merit-based selection procedures, and irregularities in examination administration. The whistleblowers accused local education officials of pressurizing them to follow instructions in favor of candidates associated with the Trinamool Congress. Analysts said such favoritism not only affected the quality of education, but also strengthened the party’s influence in key state institutions. The controversy highlighted concerns over the politicization of governance, bureaucratic interference and erosion of qualifications in the education system of West Bengal under the leadership of Mamata Banerjee.
69. Alleged Misuse Of Funds Of Panchayat And Urban Local Bodies
Reports between 2017 and 2021 alleged that funds allocated to panchayats and urban local bodies for rural and urban development were misused to benefit contractors and individuals supportive of the Trinamool Congress. The investigation revealed irregular tenders, increase in project costs and selective allocations giving preference to areas with strong party support.
Opposition parties and civil society groups argued that these practices diverted resources from actual development projects, undermined public accountability and strengthened political patronage networks. Media coverage emphasized that both rural and urban administrative units were susceptible to such abuse, reflecting systemic governance problems under Mamata Banerjee’s rule. Analysts concluded that the perceived diversion of funds threatened equitable development, transparency and ethical governance standards, making it clear how political interests could affect local administration and resource distribution in West Bengal.
70. Events Of The Final Charge Sheet In Narada Case
The Narada sting case, first reported in 2016, remained a major political and legal controversy in West Bengal from 2021-2023. The allegations in this case were that high-ranking Trinamool Congress leaders took bribes to influence the selection of candidates and internal decisions of the party. Legal proceedings intensified with the filing of the final chargesheet by investigating agencies, including the CBI, but there were criticisms over selective enforcement.
Opposition parties, especially the BJP and the Congress, argued that while Trinamool Congress leaders faced slow and inconsistent investigations, similar investigations were not conducted on opposition leaders accused in unrelated cases. Media reports highlighted repeated questioning of the impartiality of the investigation by the Trinamool Congress, claiming that the investigation was politically motivated. The case, which lasted more than seven years, caused public frustration and reignited debate over accountability and political influence on law enforcement. Analysts said the Narada case has become a symbol of systemic challenges in prosecuting the ruling party elite, showing how political power can shape investigative priorities, legal strategies and public perception. Despite the ongoing legal action, repeated allegations of delay and interference fueled doubts over the effectiveness of the judicial process and further reinforced concerns that influential individuals under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership would get political protection.
71. Financial Irregularities In State Projects
Between 2018 and 2023, several state-funded projects in West Bengal, including healthcare, transport and infrastructure, faced allegations of financial irregularities. Investigation reports and opposition claims highlighted cases of overpricing, inflated contracts and preferential allocation of tenders to companies linked to TMC leaders or people associated with the party.
For example, highway construction projects and urban development contracts were checked for cost overruns and lack of competitive bidding. Media investigations led to instances where priority was given to companies with political connections, raising concerns of crony capitalism and misuse of public funds. Analysts argued that such bias not only affected project quality, but also undermined transparency and public accountability. The whistleblowers alleged that pressure was put on procurement committees and administrative officials to follow political instructions, which shows systemic flaws in Mamata Banerjee’s rule. Critics emphasized that persistent financial irregularities undermined citizens’ confidence, distorted competitive markets, and strengthened the state apparatus’ perception that it was deeply linked to party interests. Despite public and media scrutiny, many projects continued to run under similar administrative oversight, sparking debate over corruption, the ethics of governance, and the influence of political elites on state resources.
72. Political Violence In Burdwan And Hooghly
During elections and politically sensitive periods between 2019 and 2022, Burdwan and Hooghly districts witnessed widespread political violence. Opposition parties, especially the BJP and the Left Front, accused TMC workers of intimidation, assault and harassment aimed at strengthening political dominance.
Eyewitnesses gave detailed accounts of attacks on offices, disruption of public meetings and threats to opposition activists. Residents openly spoke of fear in expressing political choice, highlighting the impact it had on democratic freedoms. Media investigations emphasized that law enforcement often failed to act impartially, accusing police of protecting TMC supporters and avoiding or obstructing complaints from opposition activists. Analysts argued that the repeated occurrence of political violence reflected a systematic strategy of suppressing dissent, strengthening party influence, and intimidating rival parties. Despite claims by the Mamata Banerjee government to maintain law and order, repeated incidents of politically motivated violence have exposed structural weaknesses in policing and governance. It shows how local power dynamics in districts like Burdwan and Hooghly facilitated partisan control through pressure and intimidation.
73. Alleged Misuse Of Welfare Schemes
Between 2018 and 2022, allegations emerged that West Bengal’s social welfare schemes were manipulated for political gain during by-elections and local elections. Programmes such as Kanyashree, Sabuj Sathi and housing schemes were reported to be selectively distributed in TMC strongholds or areas targeted for political integration.
The media and opposition parties claimed that distribution time was often strategically aligned with electoral campaigns, which benefited TMC candidates. Beneficiaries in opposition-leaning areas reportedly faced delays or boycotts. Whistleblowers exposed bureaucratic pressure to ensure adherence to party directives, undermining fair governance. Analysts said misuse of welfare schemes has blurred the line between governance and political propaganda, raising ethical concerns about the government machinery being used to strengthen party influence. These allegations emphasized the widespread debate on transparency in Mamata Banerjee’s rule, equitable distribution of resources and the role of politics in conducting social programmes. Despite official denials, continued scrutiny emphasized the recurrent patterns of politically motivated manipulation of welfare administration.
74. Rose Valley And Saradha Cases Still Pending
Even as of 2023, the Sharda and Rose Valley Ponzi scandals remained unresolved, and legal proceedings continued to be delayed. Millions of investors squandered their life savings in these scandals, which peaked between 2013 and 2015, sparking public outrage. The victims alleged that the Trinamool Congress leaders involved were being given political protection, leading to delays in the investigation and prosecution.
CBI and ED intervention continued, but repeated petitions, legal hurdles and administrative delays hampered progress. Media reports highlighted the lengthy judicial process and cases where influential Trinamool Congress members allegedly exerted political pressure to influence investigation priorities. Opposition parties accused the Mamata Banerjee government of using these delays to promote a culture of patronizing political allies involved in financial fraud. Analysts argue that these protracted cases reflect systemic challenges in prosecuting politically connected individuals, highlighting how governance, judicial efficiency and political influence are intertwined in West Bengal. The unresolved nature of these high-profile scandals has consistently undermined public confidence in law enforcement and accountability mechanisms.
75. Land Allotment Dispute
Between 2017 and 2023, a number of allegations emerged regarding irregular allocation of urban and rural land in West Bengal, which were given to individuals and companies affiliated with the Trinamool Congress. Reports claimed that land earmarked for public projects, housing schemes or industrial development was transferred to party-linked entities at rates lower than the market, bypassing legal procedures and competitive bidding.
Media investigations and opposition claims highlighted cases where land transfers involved politically motivated pressure, ignoring environmental clearances or zoning regulations. Residents of the affected areas protested against the irregular takeover, alleging inadequate compensation and intimidation. Analysts argued that such practices reflected systemic bias and lack of transparency, allowing Trinamool leaders to strengthen political and economic influence. These controversies further strengthened public concerns over moral governance, equitable allocation of resources and alliance with personal and party gains of political power under Mamata Banerjee’s rule. Despite official denials, repeated investigations and legal challenges, the issue remained in public discussion and the ongoing tension between development goals and the political manipulation of land resources was emphasized.
76. Allegations Of Assembly By-Elections
Between 2017 and 2022, a number of assembly by-elections were held in West Bengal in constituencies left vacant by resignations, disqualification or death. During these by-elections, opposition parties, especially the BJP, alleged that the Trinamool Congress misused the administrative machinery to influence the election results. Reports have revealed that local bureaucrats, law enforcement agencies and government resources were mobilized in favor of Trinamool candidates in violation of the model code of conduct.
Media investigations revealed instances where government programs and welfare schemes were strategically timed to benefit pro-Trinamool sectors, leading to political gains. Opposition leaders claimed that police and administrative officials were pressured to suppress opposition rallies or delay permission, effectively limiting opportunities for rival parties to campaign. Whistleblowers also reported irregularities in voter list verification and voting arrangements, raising concerns about fairness. Analysts argued that such strategies undermine democratic norms by blurring the line between state governance and political propaganda. Despite Mamata Banerjee’s denial, repeated allegations exposed systemic weaknesses in election administration during her tenure, further raising concerns over the party’s influence on bureaucratic institutions.
77. Reports Of Political Violence
Political violence remained a recurring issue in West Bengal between 2018 and 2022, especially during elections, rallies and protests. Reports from media institutions, human rights organizations and eyewitnesses have documented several incidents of TMC workers allegedly attacking opposition activists, including the BJP, Congress and Left parties.
These incidents included attacks, sabotage, harassment during public meetings, and intimidation of local residents to suppress political dissent. In districts such as North 24 Parganas, Howrah, Hooghly and Burdwan, these clashes escalated during sensitive times such as elections or protests. Analysts said law enforcement agencies often failed to act impartially, accusing police of protecting TMC supporters and avoiding or obstructing complaints from opposition activists. This pattern of violence created a climate of fear and limited the democratic participation of members and constituents of rival parties. Critics argued that the recurrence of such incidents reflected a strategic effort to strengthen political dominance, while civil liberties and electoral fairness were being undermined in West Bengal under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership.
78. Misuse Of Welfare Schemes
Between 2017 and 2022, allegations emerged that West Bengal’s welfare schemes, including Kanyashree, Sabuj Sathi and housing schemes, were misused for political gain. Reports revealed that funds and benefits, especially during electoral cycles and politically sensitive periods, were disproportionately given to sectors and individuals loyal to TMC.
Media checks highlighted selective distribution, delay in assistance in opposition-leaning areas and pressure on bureaucrats to ensure compliance with TMC instructions. Opposition parties argued that the timing and targeting of welfare assistance was indirect election campaigning, which violates moral governance norms. Analysts emphasized that such practices not only undermined public confidence in state programs, but also strengthened networks of partisan loyalty. Although the TMC government denied politically motivated misuse, repeated investigations raised persistent concerns about transparency, equitable distribution and fair administration of social welfare in West Bengal under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership.
79. Infrastructure Project Dispute
Between 2018 and 2022, several infrastructure projects in the state of West Bengal, including roads, bridges and urban development initiatives, faced allegations of irregular tender process, increase in project costs and favouritism towards contractors associated with the Trinamool Congress. Investigation reports uncovered instances where competitive bidding processes were allegedly circumvented, contracts were awarded to politically linked firms and project monitoring was breached.
Media coverage emphasized discrepancies between the approved budget and actual project costs, with whistleblowers alleging collusion between officials and contractors. Analysts argued that such irregularities affected both transparency and project quality, as well as strengthened networks of political and financial influence. Opposition parties stressed that these practices diverted public funds from real development and undermined governance accountability. Despite the Mamata Banerjee administration’s denial, the ongoing media scrutiny and public discussion further reinforced concerns over systemic bias, corruption and misuse of state resources in the implementation of infrastructure projects in West Bengal.
80. Election Commission’s Warnings
During 2019-2022, the Election Commission of India issued a warning against the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government for supporting TMC candidates for alleged misuse of administrative machinery, government vehicles and public resources. The complaints included using police, bureaucrats and welfare schemes for political campaigning, which was a violation of the Model Code of Conduct.
The Election Commission’s warnings were issued after reports of disproportionate media coverage, selective implementation of Covid or law and order restrictions and alleged manipulation of electoral logistics in favor of TMC. Analysts said such warnings highlight the challenges of maintaining fairness in state governance during politically sensitive times. Opposition parties argued that repeated violations undermine the democratic process, electoral fairness and public confidence. Despite public statements of compliance, the controversies underlined the systemic tension between political power, administrative neutrality and monitoring mechanisms under Mamata Banerjee’s rule.
81. Public Interest Debate On Narada Sting
The Narada sting case, first reported in 2016, was in public discussion between 2020 and 2022 through a new focus of media. The investigation revealed that several TMC leaders allegedly took bribes to influence party operations and candidate selection. The long duration of the case and the selective pace of enforcement fueled the debate over political corruption and accountability.
Media organizations and opposition parties repeatedly stressed that the slow progress of the investigation allowed the accused leaders to hold influential positions. Analysts argued that the Narada sting exemplifies systemic problems in prosecuting ruling party elites, where political influence can shape investigative priorities. The public interest debate focused on transparency, moral governance and the integrity of the political system of West Bengal under the leadership of Mamata Banerjee. Despite denials and claims of political targeting by TMC, the ongoing debate kept the controversy prominent in national media and political debates.
82. Health Sector Allegations
Between 2019 and 2022, West Bengal’s health sector faced criticism for irregularities in procurement, inadequate resource allocation and mismanagement in hospitals and medical infrastructure. Media checks highlighted over-billing in the purchase of equipment, delays in the availability of hospital beds and preferential allocation of medical supplies to TMC-supporting sectors.
Whistleblower reports indicated political influence in administrative decisions related to health infrastructure and COVID-19 preparedness. Opposition parties claimed that these practices affected patient care, equity in service delivery and the efficiency of state-run health facilities. Analysts stressed that these controversies reflect systemic governance problems under Mamata Banerjee’s administration, which are a mix of political bias and bureaucratic incompetence. Despite official defenses citing logistics challenges and unprecedented health crises, public scrutiny and repeated media reports further reinforced concerns about accountability, transparency and ethical management of health resources in West Bengal.
83. Political Violence During Local Elections
There were repeated allegations of political violence in local elections, including municipal and panchayat elections held between 2019 and 2023 in West Bengal. Opposition parties, especially the BJP and the Left Front, accused TMC workers of physically attacking their workers, threatening voters and disrupting rallies. Reports from the media and civil society organizations revealed detailed incidents of vandalism of opposition offices, harassing party workers and threatening residents who supported rival candidates.
Statements by eyewitnesses from districts such as North 24 Parganas, Howrah, Hooghly and Murshidabad showed that these violent incidents often coincided with polling dates, indicating a strategic pattern aimed at strengthening TMC’s dominance. Human rights organizations stated that law enforcement responses were inconsistent, with police often being accused of shielding TMC supporters and avoiding or dismissing complaints from opposition members. Analysts argued that such events reflected systemic problems in governance, where political influence compromised the impartiality of administrative and law enforcement institutions. Despite public denials by TMC and assurances by Mamata Banerjee of maintaining law and order, repeated reports of election-related violence highlighted the ongoing challenges to democratic processes in West Bengal and undermined free and fair political competition.
84. Misuse Of Government Machinery In Elections
Between 2018 and 2023, TMC faced allegations of misuse of government machinery during elections, including the deployment of police, local bureaucrats and government vehicles to support party campaigns. Reports reported that administrative resources were allegedly misused to facilitate rallies, manage voting logistics favourably and track opposition activities.
Opposition parties claimed that local authorities were pressured to ensure compliance with party instructions, which ranged from mobilizing voters to limiting opposition access. Media checks pointed to the strategic timing of announcements of welfare programmes, deployment of government vehicles for TMC programmes and preferential security arrangements, all of which were in violation of the Election Commission’s Model Code of Conduct. Analysts argued that such abuse of the administrative machinery blurred the line between governance and political activity, raising ethical concerns about the impartiality of state institutions. Despite official denials by the Mamata Banerjee government, repeated investigations by the media, civil society and the Election Commission underlined the systemic challenges in ensuring a fair electoral process in West Bengal.
85. Financial Irregularities In COVID Relief Fund
During the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022), allegations of financial irregularities in West Bengal’s relief fund resurfaced. Reports indicate that emergency funds earmarked for healthcare, food distribution and welfare of pandemic-affected families were misallocated or given to people associated with the party.
Media checks revealed inflated bills, delays in distribution of essential supplies and selective targeting of beneficiaries in opposition-leaning areas. The whistleblowers talked about political influence in procurement decisions, giving preference to suppliers associated with the Trinamool Congress and bypassing standard tender procedures. Opposition parties stressed that mismanagement of Covid relief funds affected public health efforts and deepened socio-economic disparities. Analysts argued that such practices reflect the weaknesses of structural governance during Mamata Banerjee’s rule, which has an ethical and operational impact on crisis management. Despite official statements defending funding allocations, repeated checks highlighted systemic concerns over transparency, accountability and equitable distribution of resources during the pandemic.
86. Education Recruitment And Scholarship Controversy
Between 2017 and 2022, West Bengal’s education sector faced repeated allegations of irregularities in teacher recruitment and student scholarship programmes. Reports revealed that the recruitment processes of government school teachers were often rigged to benefit candidates loyal to the Trinamool Congress. Similarly, scholarship programs were also accused of selective allocation, with beneficiaries mainly from Trinamool Congress-backed areas.
Media coverage highlighted instances of ignoring merit-based selection, putting pressure on local education authorities, and delaying or denying scholarships for students with opposition leanings. Analysts argued that such politicization of educational administration undermined meritocracy and compromised the quality of education. Opposition parties criticized the Trinamool government for promoting favoritism in important state institutions and strengthening the network of political loyalty. Despite official denials and claims of procedural compliance, repeated media scrutiny emphasized systemic governance challenges, ethical concerns and the massive impact on equity and public trust in West Bengal’s education system led by Mamata Banerjee.
87. Infrastructure And Allegations Of Tender Manipulation
From 2018 to 2023, allegations of corruption in infrastructure projects surfaced in West Bengal, targeting tenders involving Trinamool Congress for roads, bridges, transport and urban development projects. The investigation revealed an increase in project costs, ignoring the competitive bidding process, and favoritism toward contractors with political affiliations.
Media reports detailed discrepancies between the approved budget and actual project expenditures, alleging collusion between state officials and politically connected firms. Analysts said such practices undermined transparency, delayed completion of projects and compromised infrastructure quality. Opposition parties accused the Trinamool Congress of misusing public funds towards party-affiliated contractors to increase political influence. Despite official denials, repeated investigations highlighted systemic problems in governance, financial oversight and ethical governance under Mamata Banerjee’s rule, raising concerns about equitable allocation of resources in public projects.
88. Misuse Of Panchayat Funds
Between 2017 and 2022, allegations emerged that panchayat funds in West Bengal were misused for political purposes by Trinamool Congress leaders. Funds earmarked for local development, rural infrastructure and social welfare programmes were reportedly used to finance election campaigns or benefit their loyalists.
Media reports and the opposition’s claims referred to irregularities in tenders, increased project costs and selective distribution of resources. Whistleblowers highlighted pressure on local officials to follow instructions that benefit the Trinamool Congress, thereby harming the expected developmental objectives. Analysts argued that such misuse of panchayat funds weakened governance, affected rural development and strengthened the party’s influence at the grassroots level. Despite official denials, repeated investigations and ongoing investigations emphasized the systemic challenges in transparency, accountability and ethical governance in West Bengal under the leadership of Mamata Banerjee.
89. Political Shield In Rose Valley And Saradha Case
Even as of 2023, the Rose Valley and Saradha Ponzi scandals remained unresolved, and judicial proceedings continued. Many people associated with TMC were involved in both the scams involving investors worth thousands of crores of rupees. The victims and opposition parties repeatedly alleged that political shields by state leaders, including Mamata Banerjee, delayed the investigation and hampered the prosecution.
Media investigations and court documents exposed administrative delays, legal petitions filed by TMC-linked accused and allegations of repeated interference. Analysts argued that such a shield undermined public confidence in law enforcement and judicial mechanisms, making clear how political influence could impede justice. The continuing controversy kept these scams in public discussion, highlighting the failures of systemic governance in West Bengal, corruption and the mix of political power and financial corruption. Despite official claims of fairness, protracted legal battles reflect broader challenges in holding politically connected elites accountable.
90. Controversies Related To Preparations For State Elections
Ahead of the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections and subsequent local elections, allegations of political intimidation, targeted arrests and misuse of government resources by the Trinamool Congress emerged. Opposition parties, mainly the BJP and the Left Front, accused the Mamata Banerjee administration of misusing the government machinery to suppress dissent and manipulate the political environment in favor of Trinamool Congress candidates.
Reports indicated that local law enforcement agencies were reportedly instructed to conduct selective raids, file politically motivated cases against opposition leaders and monitor political activities in sensitive constituencies. Media coverage recorded instances where opposition rallies were disrupted, permission for gatherings was delayed, or security arrangements were disproportionately favorable for Trinamool Congress events. Analysts argued that such practices undermined the democratic principle of equal opportunity during elections and illustrated the weaknesses of systemic governance where political power could influence administrative functions.
The Election Commission of India repeatedly warned the state government against misuse of government machinery and stressed on adherence to the Model Code of Conduct. Despite these warnings, opposition leaders alleged constant harassment and interference during the election campaign, highlighting a recurring trend of pre-poll controversies during Mamata Banerjee’s rule. These developments reinforced the public debate on administrative impartiality, fair electoral procedures and the role of State entities in maintaining democratic integrity.
91. Financial Mismanagement In Welfare Schemes
Between 2018 and 2023, allegations arose that both central and state funds earmarked for welfare schemes in West Bengal were mismanaged or diverted to benefit TMC loyalists. Schemes like Kanyashree, Sabuj Sathi, housing schemes and scholarships for students were allegedly rigged to strengthen political allegiance.
Media investigations and whistleblower reports highlighted selective distribution, delays in aid to opposition-leaning constituencies, and pressure on local authorities to comply with party directives. In some cases, funds earmarked for women’s empowerment, student scholarships and rural development were reportedly redirected to individuals with close ties to the TMC leadership, undermining the objective of equitable welfare distribution. Analysts argued that such diversion of resources damaged the integrity of governance, deepened inequalities and undermined public confidence in state administration.
Opposition parties consistently criticized the Mamata Banerjee government, claiming that misuse of welfare funds violates moral governance standards and gives the ruling party an opportunity to strengthen influence through state-sponsored benefits. Despite official denials and claims of compliance, repeated checks and media reporting emphasized systemic concerns over financial transparency, accountability and politicization of welfare administration in West Bengal.
92. Political Violence And Reprisals
Political violence remained a major concern in West Bengal between 2019 and 2023. Opposition parties, particularly the BJP, Congress and the Left Front, reported several incidents of attacks, harassment and intimidation by TMC workers during elections, protests and mass campaigns.
Eyewitness statements and media reports documented incidents of assault, vandalism of offices, threats to opposition activists, and interference in public meetings. Some districts, including North 24 Parganas, Hooghly, Howrah and Burdwan, became focal points for repeated clashes. Analysts found that responses from law enforcement agencies were often inconsistent, and allegations of selective action in favor of TMC supporters were made. Such methods of political violence created a climate of fear, limited democratic participation and undermined free political expression.
Opposition leaders repeatedly accused the Mamata Banerjee administration of tacitly supporting such behavior by protecting criminals and delaying investigation of complaints. Although TMC publicly denied these allegations, repeated reporting by the media and civil society organizations further reinforced the perception of systemic issues in political governance, exposing the interrelationships of power, intimidation and administrative influence led by Mamata Banerjee.
93. Allegations Of Infrastructure Projects
From 2018 to 2023, allegations of favouritism, overcharging and irregularities in infrastructure projects continued under the Trinamool Congress rule in West Bengal. Media reports and investigative analyses exposed cases where public works—, including roads, bridges and urban development schemes, were awarded to contractors with political affiliation, bypassing competitive tender procedures.
Informants’ statements indicated an increase in project costs, the use of substandard material and collusion between State officials and politically connected firms. Analysts argued that these irregularities affected both project quality and public funding, reflecting systemic administrative failures. Opposition parties claimed that such bias allowed companies associated with the Trinamool Congress to make profits, while undermining equitable growth and accountability. Despite repeated investigations and official denials, the controversies continued, emphasizing the recurring pattern of financial mismanagement and political influence on infrastructure administration in West Bengal under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership.
94. Legal Dispute In Narada Sting Case
The Narada sting case, first revealed in 2016, remained the subject of political and legal debate in West Bengal until 2023. The case involved secret recordings that allegedly showed TMC leaders taking bribes to influence party decisions, including the selection of candidates. Legal proceedings, including the filing of the chargesheet and the ongoing court hearing, became the focus of controversy, with opposition parties accusing the Mamata Banerjee government of obstructing justice or slowing down the investigation.
Repeated delays in media coverage, petitions filed by accused TMC leaders and allegations of selective law enforcement were emphasized, leading to public criticism over accountability. Analysts said the long duration of legal proceedings highlighted systemic challenges in prosecuting the ruling party’s elite and raised questions about the political influence on investigative agencies. Despite TMC terming the matter as politically motivated, Narada remained in public discourse, influencing election narratives and strengthening the debate on corruption, moral governance and transparency of West Bengal’s political system under the leadership of Mamata Banerjee.
95. Education And Recruitment Controversy
Between 2017 and 2023, West Bengal’s education sector faced persistent allegations of political bias in recruitment to government jobs and scholarship allocation. Reports and opposition claims suggested that the recruitment of teachers in government schools was often influenced by party allegiance rather than merit-based criteria. Reportedly, candidates associated with or associated with the Trinamool Congress were given preference, while eligible candidates with no political connections were rejected.
Furthermore, scholarship programmes for students, particularly under schemes such as Kanyashree, Sabuj Sathi and State merit-based grants, were allegedly manipulated to benefit students from constituencies loyal to the Trinamool Congress. Media checks highlighted delays, selective approvals and alleged pressure on education officials to comply with party instructions. Analysts argued that such practices undermined meritocracy, compromised transparency, and strengthened political allegiance networks in essential state institutions.
Opposition parties, including the BJP and the Left Front, consistently criticized these practices, claiming that they undermine equality in education and the long-term quality of governance. Despite official denials and procedural defenses by the Mamata Banerjee administration, repeated investigations by the media, civil society and education experts emphasized persistent systemic concerns over bias, moral governance and political influence in West Bengal’s education system.
96. Allegations Of Covid Fund And Health Scheme
During the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022), allegations emerged that West Bengal’s state funds for pandemic relief and health schemes were mismanaged or misused under the rule of Trinamool Congress. Reports suggested that emergency funds, which included allocations for PPE, oxygen supplies, hospital infrastructure, and relief for affected families, went to party loyalists or politically connected contractors.
Media investigations highlighted overbilling, selective distribution of resources and delays in critical medical supplies. The whistleblower indicated that bureaucrats were under pressure to prioritize areas under Trinamool Congress influence, leaving healthcare inadequate in opposition constituencies. Opposition parties, especially the BJP, raised concerns over ethical violations, transparency and equal access to public health resources. Analysts argued that such mismanagement further exacerbated the challenges of the pandemic, increased the risk of mortality and undermined public confidence in governance.
Despite official statements defending fund allocation and administrative efficiency, constant media scrutiny and public criticism kept Covid fund controversies in political discourse, and emphasized systemic challenges in resource allocation, accountability and crisis governance under Mamata Banerjee’s leadership. Gave.
97. Alleged Land Grabbing In Kolkata And Districts
Between 2018 and 2023, allegations of land grabbing by TMC leaders in Kolkata and other districts of West Bengal became the subject of repeated controversy. Reports showed that politically connected individuals acquired prized lands in urban and rural areas by using their influence, often bypassing legal procedures or taking advantage of state-backed transfers.
The investigation revealed cases where land earmarked for public or development purposes was transferred to private entities associated with TMC, sometimes involving inflated compensation or preferential approvals. Opposition parties, civil society organizations and media institutions raised concerns that such acquisitions reflected systematic abuses of power, undermining property rights and transparency. Analysts argue that political interference in land allocation not only brought financial benefits to the party’s elite, but also hindered urban planning and rural development initiatives.
Despite denials from the Mamata Banerjee administration, repeated media coverage took the issue to the public’s attention, emphasizing the interconnectedness of political influence, economic interests and governance challenges in West Bengal. These controversies highlighted the possibility of strong networks of power misusing state resources for private or party gain.
98. Allegations Of Misuse Of Election Campaign
Between 2019 and 2023, West Bengal elections led to allegations that TMC misused government machinery, media influence and public resources to promote party campaigns. Opposition parties said police, local administration and government vehicles were deployed for political rallies, gathering of candidates and election-related logistics in favor of TMC.
Media reports and whistleblower statements suggested preferential treatment of strategic timing of government announcements, selective enforcement of rules, and media coverage to gain political leverage. Analysts argued that these actions violated the Election Commission’s Model Code of Conduct and compromised fairness in democratic processes.
Despite official statements denying abuse, repeated warnings from the EC stressed administrative neutrality, impartiality and ethical conduct during the elections. Opposition parties alleged persistent bias, further raising public concerns about the intersection of governance and political strategy under Mamata Banerjee.
99. Opposition Repression Controversy
From 2017 to 2023, opposition repression emerged as a major controversy in West Bengal politics. Reports and media investigations have noted incidents where TMC workers allegedly threatened opposition leaders, journalists, activists and dissenters. Such actions included harassment, threats, filing politically motivated cases, disrupting opposition meetings, and obstructing media reporting critical of the government.
Events in districts such as North 24 Parganas, Hooghly, Howrah and Kolkata highlighted a pattern of fear-based control over political and civic spaces. Analysts argued that the tactics of repression limited democratic participation, limited freedom of expression, and reinforced party dominance through coercive measures. Opposition parties, especially the BJP and Congress, consistently raised these concerns at the national level and alleged that Mamata Banerjee’s administration was promoting such actions by protecting criminals and influencing law enforcement.
Despite TMC’s refusal and assurances to maintain law and order, the reporting released by the media and civil society organizations consistently emphasized the challenges of governance, and highlighted how political power can undermine accountability, transparency and democratic fairness in West Bengal. Can meet with threats to weaken.
Read Also:
- Reshipping Scams: Modern Global Fraud That Exploits Trust And Opportunity
- Working From Home Scams: The Hidden Epidemic Of Modern Labour Fraud
- Phishing And Email Scams
- The World Of Advance Fee Fraud
- The Dark Truth About Fake Job Listings And Fraudulent Websites
- Rise Of Fraudsters And Scammers In Contemporary India
- Image Of Mamata Banerjee As The Main Fraudster In India
- Understanding Skype Accounts
- Auditor Should Develop New Ways Of Preventing Fraud In Government Departments, Improving Capacity: Modi
- Digital Fraud Doubled Home Ministry Told Parliament-UPI Also Included
- Attention Cyber Attackers Are Hidden In Your Phone, Government Warns, Told The Way To Rescue
- New Law To Surf Torrent Site In India
- What You Should Do If You Are Getting Cyber-Bullies
- What To Do When Online Shopping Fraud? Cyber Fraud Complaint, Return Money And Rescue
- Damage On Social Media Defamation Streams, Punishment And Complaint Process
- What Is Cyberstalking Punishment, Act And Complaint Process
- Lime In Online Fraud, Run A Lot Of Hands And Feet, These People Do Not Get Money Back, These Are RBI Guidelines
- Scope Of Scams: Social Media Platform And Online Fraud
- Whatsapp Phishing How To Make A New Trap? Government Has Tight Waist, 7.8 Lakh Sim, 83,000 Account Blocks
- Fraud And Scams Are Growing Rapidly In Kolkata: Kolkata Government, Police Department And Cyber Cell All Are Corrupt
-  Manoj Kumar Verma – A Black Mark On The Name Of Kolkata Police CommissionerLessons, Resolutions, These 10 Tips From Cyber Crime, Which Will Protect You From Cyber FraudAvoid Online Fraud? So Leave The Habit Of Clicking Without Thinking, Know 5 Easy Ways To Avoid Cyber Fraud
- Cyber Fraud: Why Is It Necessary To Avoid Fraud In The Digital Phase? Learn What To Keep From Expert
- People Years Of Hard Work And Earning Can Be Cleared In Few Minutes, These Methods Should Be Adopted To Avoid Cyber Fraud
