The Most Common Complaints Against The Police

As an institution, the police exist to enforce the law, maintain order and ensure the safety of citizens. Ideally, police forces are seen as impartial, disciplined and defenders of human rights. In practice, however, relations between the police and the public are often fraught with tension, mistrust and discontent. Around the world, and especially in countries with large populations and complex social structures such as India, complaints against the police are deeply rooted in broader, multidimensional and systemic issues, socio-political dynamics and human behavior. These complaints stem from both individual complaints and collective experiences, highlighting structural flaws in policing.

One of the most common complaints against the police concerns corruption and bribery. Corruption in policing is a widespread issue that undermines the credibility of law enforcement institutions. Citizens often report that police officers ask for bribes in exchange for evading arrest, withdrawing charges, or giving protection to criminals. This practice has been observed in many countries, where the authorities abuse their discretionary rights for private gain. The public recognizes that law enforcement prefers economic incentives to justice, thereby undermining confidence in the justice system. Corruption can manifest itself in many forms, from petty extortion when traffic stops to massive collusion with organized crime gangs. In many cases, ordinary citizens feel helpless to challenge these practices because the mechanisms that monitor police conduct are themselves weak or do not have adequate resources. The notion that justice is served only by those who can afford it creates a deep social rift, further exacerbating tensions between law enforcement and communities.

Another frequent complaint is that of abuse of power. This complaint covers a wide scope of behaviours, including excessive use of force, arbitrary detention, harassment and intimidation. There have been reports of various forms of excessive use of force by police officers, ranging from ill-treatment during arrest to violent repression of protests. Citizens often report being beaten, threatened or humiliated in minor infractions or even without justification. Such abuses are often motivated by the hierarchical nature of policing, where junior officers follow the instructions of senior officers, without calling into question the legality or morality of their actions. This culture of obedience, combined with inadequate accountability mechanisms, allows abusive behaviour to continue. Arbitrary detention, where individuals are detained without due legal reason, establishes the image of the police as a repressive force rather than a protective force. The oppression of marginalized communities, including ethnic minorities, the poor and socially vulnerable populations, is another dimension of abuse, reflecting the wide social inequalities and prejudices that pervade law enforcement processes.

Negligence and incompetence are also common complaints against police forces. Many citizens express frustration at the slow or inadequate response to crimes, delays in filing complaints and failure to investigate. This inefficiency is often attributed to bureaucratic obstacles, lack of proper training and lack of resources. When a police department fails to act immediately, victims feel left out, and perpetrators go unpunished, further eroding public confidence. Complaints of negligence also include cases where evidence is mishandled, reports are lost, or cases are incorrectly documented, leading to miscarriages of justice. In some cases, officials may deliberately ignore complaints or fail to take action due to prejudices, relationships, or temptations from influential individuals. The result is a sense of helplessness among citizens, who may feel that legal remedies are ineffective or inaccessible.

Another common complaint is prejudice and discrimination. Police institutions, being a reflection of the society they serve, are not free from prejudice. Complaints often focus on the perception that authorities favour certain individuals, groups or communities while unfairly targeting others. This bias may be based on race, religion, socio-economic status, gender, or political affiliation. Discriminatory policing undermines equality before the law and promotes systemic injustice. For example, minority groups may be more frequently checked, searched or monitored, while wealthy or influential individuals may be exempt from similar checks. Gender-based discrimination is another dimension, where women complain of harassment, inappropriate behaviour or lack of sensitivity in handling cases related to sexual harassment or domestic violence. Prejudice in policing reduces trust and can exacerbate social tensions, as communities feel isolated and oppressed by the institution that aims to serve them.

Corruption-related complaints are closely linked to the issue of police complicity in crime. In many areas, citizens report that some authorities often maintain informal links with criminals, gangs or fraudsters in exchange for a share of illicit proceeds. This collusion gives rise to a dual system of law enforcement where contact criminals act fearlessly, while ordinary citizens face strict action. Such relationships are difficult to prove, but are widely considered suspicious and are discussed in public discourse. Complaints about organized crime or police collusion with local bullies not only undermine justice but also create an atmosphere of fear. Ordinary citizens may feel that seeking police assistance may expose them to greater risk or retaliation, making the police a source of insecurity rather than security.

Lack of accountability and transparency is another major complaint. Citizens often feel that police actions are not adequately investigated and that the mechanisms put in place to address complaints are either weak or difficult to access. Complaints may be lodged with internal affairs units, oversight commissions or human rights bodies, but these often fail to provide timely and effective solutions. Alleged impunity of police officers, fuels suspicion and discourages citizens from reporting abuses. Transparency issues include hiding records, lack of public reporting, and minimal communication about the progress of the case. When citizens feel that the police are being shielded from the consequences, public confidence is undermined and the law enforcement system’s legitimacy is damaged.

Extortion and harassment for personal gain is another area of widespread complaints. Police officers may abuse their authority to obtain money, favors, or sexual services from citizens. This exploitation can occur in everyday situations, such as traffic violations, business licenses or land disputes. Vulnerable groups such as women, children and low-income persons are particularly susceptible. In addition to economic extortion, citizens report harassment in the form of threats, intimidation or coercion to influence behaviour or decisions. These practices not only violate individual rights, but also foster a culture of fear and subordination, thereby eroding the fundamental principles of justice.

The ineffective handling of sensitive crimes is a major source of complaints, especially in cases involving sexual harassment, domestic violence, child abuse and other sensitive groups. Citizens often report that complaints in these areas are taken for granted, dismissed, or the blame is placed on the victims themselves. Women, children and marginalized persons often face indifference or hostility when seeking police assistance. This failure is compounded by inadequate training, social prejudices and the lack of specialized units to handle such matters sensitively. Victims may suffer repeated trauma due to procedural delays, the insensitivity of the authorities and the absence of timely intervention. As a result, the reporting of such crimes is reduced, which emboldens the perpetrators and perpetuates the cycle of abuse.

Political interference in policing is another systematic source of complaints. Police institutions, especially in countries with complex political dynamics, often operate under the influence of politicians and governing authorities. Citizens may complain that police action is selective, favours politically connected individuals or represses opposition supporters. It undermines the rule of law and compromises the impartiality of law enforcement. Authorities may be under pressure to manipulate evidence, fabricate cases, or protect influential individuals from prosecution. Such political interference creates a perception of favoritism and injustice, where ordinary citizens feel vulnerable to manipulation or exploitation by influential people.

Failure to protect civilians during public unrest or emergencies is a common complaint. When events such as riots, natural disasters or public protests occur, the public expects timely and effective intervention from law enforcement agencies. Civilians often report inadequate preparation, delayed response or partial enforcement, which can exacerbate losses and lead to chaos. Complaints include failure to prevent violence, protect property or ensure safety. In some cases, the police may act selectively, targeting certain groups while ignoring crimes committed by others. Lack of impartiality and promptness undermines public confidence in the police as guardians of law and order.

Neglect in community policing and public participation is increasingly appearing as a complaint in modern societies. Citizens often feel isolated from law enforcement agencies, viewing officers as distant, inaccessible, or hostile. Traditional community policing emphasizes engagement, confidence building and preventive measures, but these methods are often inadequately applied. Complaints arise when citizens are unable to express their concerns, receive guidance or cooperate with the police to address local issues. This separation between the police and the communities they serve can lead to mistrust, miscommunication and the missed opportunities to prevent crime.

Abusive or abusive behavior during regular interactions is another common cause of dissatisfaction. Citizens often face rudeness, arrogance or neglect from the authorities during normal conversations like stopping traffic, filing complaints or document verification. While these behaviors may seem modest compared to corruption or violence, they promote a broader perception of unprofessionalism and alienation. The perception of the public as having a hostile or indifferent attitude towards the police may reduce the voluntary cooperation required for effective law enforcement.

Delays in investigation and delivery of justice are persistent complaints. Even when citizens manage to report crimes and follow due process, they often face long waiting periods, repeated interrogations and slow judicial process. Police inefficiency, lack of investigative expertise and bureaucratic obstacles prolong the process, frustrating victims and witnesses. Delayed justice not only affects the individuals directly involved, but also reduces the perceived effectiveness of the entire criminal justice system. Citizens may be obliged to adopt informal measures or to give in to pressure, thus further undermining the rule of law.

Complaints about issues related to police abuse during protests or political dissent are increasing rapidly in modern societies. Citizens express their grievances against the excessive suppression of peaceful demonstrations, unlawful detention of demonstrators and bullying tactics. Complaints often emphasized the use of violence, tear gas, or arrests to control dissent, rather than promoting legitimate expression. Such actions are particularly controversial when they are carried out without proper justification, legal monitoring or proportionality. These complaints reflect the tension between State power and civil liberties, and highlight the need for balance, accountability and observance of human rights.

Technical negligence and misuse of digital evidence have emerged as a modern source of complaints. With increasing reliance on technology in law enforcement, citizens often report failures to deal with cybercrime cases, digital evidence, or data privacy concerns. Complaints include loss or tampering of digital evidence, delays in processing online fraud and inadequate cyber security measures. At a time when cyber crimes are happening on a large scale, such negligence can cause considerable financial and emotional harm to the victims, which further reduces their trust in the police. Lack of training and professional development is another major cause of complaints.

Citizens often report that police officers lack adequate skills in investigation, communications, human rights or specific crime areas. Inadequate training promotes errors, misconduct and inefficiency. Complaints concerning improper interrogation, mistreatment of evidence or insensitive behaviour often stem from this deficiency. Professional development, continuous education and familiarity with best practices are essential to maintain competence, credibility and public confidence.

Proper documentation and non-adherence to legal procedures is another common complaint. Citizens report that the police are often negligent in issuing receipts of complaints, recording statements correctly or following due process. These procedural flaws can have serious consequences for victims seeking justice, as evidence can be compromised and accountability becomes difficult to enforce. Complaints in this area highlight the need for adherence to standardized procedures, audit mechanisms and legal norms.

Mental health and stress-related complaints against the police are increasingly being recognized. Citizens are sometimes faced with officials who exhibit erratic, aggressive, or unprofessional behavior due to stress, workload, or inadequate mental health support. Complaints include over-reaction, inappropriate behavior or inability to handle sensitive situations peacefully. It is essential to address the well-being of officers and provide psychological support in order to reduce complaints and ensure humane, professional policing.

Inconsistent application of the law is another recurrent complaint. Citizens report cases where legal provisions are interpreted or applied differently depending on effect, wealth or personal relationships. Selective enforcement fuels resentment, undermines social cohesion, and encourages rule-breaking by those who feel immune from the consequences. Complaints arise when similar crimes elicit different responses, highlighting perceived injustice and arbitrariness in law enforcement.

Excessive bureaucracy and procedural red tape frustrate citizens and give rise to complaints about accessibility. When citizens try to file a complaint, obtain approval or seek assistance, they often face multiple layers of approval, repeated documentation and delays. Such bureaucratic obstacles can discourage victims from seeking help, undermine trust and foster a sense of alienation.

Lack of cultural sensitivity is also a source of grievances, especially in multicultural societies. Citizens report that authorities cannot understand, respect or accommodate cultural practices, languages or traditions. Misunderstanding or insensitivity can exacerbate conflicts, generate resentment and impede effective law enforcement.

Complaints against the police are multifaceted and arise from corruption, abuse of power, negligence, discrimination, inefficiency, lack of accountability and insensitivity. These complaints reflect not only individual misconduct, but also systemic weaknesses, socio-political pressures and lack of resources. Persistent complaints undermine public confidence, impede effective policing and can destabilize the social order. The resolution of these grievances requires a comprehensive approach that includes institutional reform, professional training, accountability mechanisms, community engagement and cultural sensitivity. Understanding the depth and breadth of these grievances provides a glimpse of the challenges facing law enforcement and the urgent need for systemic change to restore trust, ensure justice and uphold the principles of equality, fairness and human rights.

Read Also: